Research Paper 2: Conducting an Experiment Writing Assignment Help. Research Paper 2: Conducting an Experiment Writing Assignment Help.
• Make sure that there should be NO PLAGIARISM
• I will post some attachments that you really need to read
• More information:
For this assignment I will attach the instructions that you have to follow such as how many pages and what kind of information you need to cover for each part. The main document that has all the information you need to know about the experiment will be the IRB proposal document, and for the other sections of the paper you will have to read the instructions carefully on the top of each document listed above.
Method materials: including hypothesis and The research question which is, are there differences in quilt radiation or rating between the three groups of the independent variables which are, eye witness, discrete eye witness and no eye witness.
Results materials: I will attach the exact template that used for this assignment in a picture form. + ( use the attached Results template
Research Paper 2: Conducting an Experiment Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]
write a 700-1000 word essay in response to the following Humanities Assignment Help
Historians look at the French Revolution and the Industrial Revolution as the “Dual Revolution,” the moment the modern came into existence and when tradition began to be challenged in many ways. New notions of government, liberty, nationhood, cities, empire, social class, economics, and war took center stage in public and political discussions.please answer the following: Describe how the French Revolution, the Industrial Revolution, and the creation of the modern nation state led to significant ideological, political and social developments in the Modern West. You should consider the roles of different groups and people, such as social activists, urban planners, political scientists, politicians, imperialists, etc. In answering this question consider the reactions represented by different ideologies: Romanticism, Socialism, Nationalism, Liberalism, etc. Make sure you make clear to which aspects of modernity different writers are reacting. Primary sources you must consider, discuss and use direct evidence from in your essay exam:
Karl Marx, The Communist Manifesto
Mary Shelley, Frankenstein
Secondary Sources you must consider and use as background in your exam:
B. A. Pavlac’s Supremacies and Diversities
You must not use any sources from outside those assigned for class. Using sources not listed on the syllabus or used in lectures will result in an automatic “F” on the final.
Your exams will be graded according to the following criteria:
Introduction and Thesis-10%
“Roadmap” Must tell me what you’re discussing in the essay. Hook your reader into the topic with a strong first sentence. Provide some essential background to the exam. Single statement laying out the argument of the essay. Should be obvious to reader.
Primary Source Evidence-30% must include direct, relevant quotes from Marx’s Communist Manifesto, and Shelley’s Frankenstein. Beyond quoting these texts, you must also explain the significance of the evidence you use from these texts and HOW the evidence supports the point you’re making.
Secondary Source Evidence-10%
Must include and use secondary sources (textbook, lectures, reputable website, database information)
Correct and consistent citations of ALL materials used
Tells the reader what you’ve argued and how you’ve proven your point. Nicely summarizes the exam, and leaves your reader with a good sense of your topic and the feeling that you’ve proven your point.
Accuracy, Organization & Style -30%
Information is correct. Command of course information and readings should be evident. Proofread. Formal.
Your essay should have an introduction that helps your reader (me) identify your response to the essay prompt. Think of the introduction as a roadmap—it will tell me exactly what you plan to talk about in your exam. Make sure you have a main thesis statement—one sentence that describes what your essay will argue about how people reacted to and experienced modernity in the nineteenth century. Did they react well? Badly? In different ways? Make that clear in your thesis.
Each part of your answer should follow in supporting paragraphs. Each of these must have an easily identifiable topic sentence that describes how the paragraph supports your main point. Each paragraph should also provide evidence. Evidence must be drawn from the primary sources listed above. For this exam you must provide primary source evidence in the form of paraphrasing AND direct quotations fromFrankenstein, and Communist Manifesto. Supporting, or secondary, evidence must come from your textbook and lectures, (and from library resources if you need them). That is how you’ll fill in the chronology and background information.
Every time you use a piece of evidence, either in the form of paraphrasing, summary, or direct quotation, you need to provide me with a citation—a reference that indicates where you got the information, who wrote that information, etc. A guide to proper citations for history papers is available on Moodle. You must use this guide as your write your exam. If you do not cite your sources properly, you will receive no credit for that portion of the exam.
Finally, your essay should have a conclusion. The point of a conclusion is to summarize your main argument. It reminds the reader of what your main point was and how you demonstrated the correctness or viability of your argument. Just as the introduction tells a reader where you’ll be going in the exam, the conclusion should tell the reader where they’ve just been. It can feel repetitive, but it is important for you as a writer to reflect on what you’ve just accomplished, and it is important for the reader to have a nice wrap-up of your argument.
Your essay will also be evaluated on accuracy and organization and style. This means that I’m looking for proofreading. Are all of your statements true? Do you display understanding and command of the information in the texts? Do all of your paragraphs have topic sentences? Do they all provide evidence to your reader? Are all your words spelled correctly? Is the essay written in a formal manner? Did you avoid informalities? Is the essay grammatically correct? Is the punctuation right? Part of convincing your reader to take you seriously means taking time with spelling, grammar, and style.
Which empirical human motivations are most important to the success of central liberal institutions and practices? Humanities Assignment Help
This is an argumentative essay that should include at least 6 sources from what I will provide. It should be 9 pages, double spaced MLA format
Moral theory can narrow disagreement on what is morally right. However, merely to agree about what is morally right does not necessarily motivate an individual, or individuals in a group, to do what is morally right.
Locke’s social contract theory, Rawls’ theory of justice, and practices such as free speech and toleration are constructed both from moral judgments and empirical claims about human motivations. We also examined empirical theories or claims about human motivation: Turiel, citizenship culture in Bogotá, homo economicus, Bowles and Gintis on behavioral experiments, Haidt’s foundations, perhaps Bandura or Pinker, and others.
Which empirical human motivations (positive reciprocity and others) are most important to the success of central liberal institutions and practices (for example, limited government, free speech, toleration) and how might common motivations support or undermine the institutions and practices? Don’t recite every motivation and every institution; rather, select a few important relationships to explicate.
peer review needed on short notice Humanities Assignment Help
Attached is the paper that you will be doing a peer review on below is the instructions and text book to use when doing this peer review! because you have to use page numbers from the text book
peer review in the format of a scholarly article review, an example of which I’ve provided via attachment. USE MY EXAMPLE AS A TEMPLATE. That will help me see quickly all the feedback you gave for each section of the proposal. (1) Start with a summary of their stated purpose and be sure to highlight what they did well first. (2) Then, give a broad overview of the areas that need work, (3) before finally giving specific critiques that give detail to the broad overview of what needs work. (4) Include page numbers, and separate comments by section of the paper.
Attached File this file is a example of how this peer review needs to look!! just like this example below apa format
- Review-The Effectiveness of Couples Therapy Based on the Gottman Method Among Iranian Couples.docx – 17.8 KB
the book to use to get information and page numbers is
Research Design: Qualitative, Quan…
Author: John W. Creswell; J. David Creswell
Evaluating Proposals and Negotiating Contracts Writing Assignment Help
DETAILS: This assignment is focused on proposal evaluation and contract negotiation. You will address various topics, questions, and scenarios. You will need to use the readings/videos, learning modules, and additional research as sources of information. For this assignment, please respond to all items listed and attach assignment as an MS Word file.
REQUIRED ACTIONS (Individual Assignment):
- Please respond to all of topics, questions, and scenarios listed.
- 800-1000 words (be thorough but succinct – – in other words work on saying more with less).
- Your response must be created in MS Word format.
- Please use at least two references overall for this assignment to support your responses. When citing resources, don’t forget to use in-text citations and a reference citation at the end using proper APA style. Please consult Purdue’s Online Writing Lab (OWL) website or your APA guide to assist you. See: OWL APA Style Guide for assistance.
Assignment: Conducting a Diagnostic Interview With a Mental Status Exam Writing Assignment Help
Before moving through diagnostic decision making, a social worker needs to conduct an interview that builds on a biopsychosocial assessment. New parts are added that clarify the timing, nature, and sequence of symptoms in the diagnostic interview. The Mental Status Exam (MSE) is a part of that process.
The MSE is designed to systematically help diagnosticians recognize patterns or syndromes of a person’s cognitive functioning. It includes very particular, direct observations about affect and other signs of which the client might not be directly aware.
When the diagnostic interview is complete, the diagnostician has far more detail about the fluctuations and history of symptoms the patient self-reports, along with the direct observations of the MSE. This combination greatly improves the chances of accurate diagnosis. Conducting the MSE and other special diagnostic elements in a structured but client-sensitive manner supports that goal. In this Assignment, you take on the role of a social worker conducting an MSE.
- Watch the video describing an MSE. Then watch the Sommers-Flanagan (2014) “Mental Status Exam” video clip. Make sure to take notes on the nine domains of the interview.
- Review the Morrison (2014) reading on the elements of a diagnostic interview.
- Download the Conducting a Diagnostic Interview with a Mental Status Exam template (ATTACHED)
Submit a 2- to 3-page paper in which you:
- Write up your MSE for Carl based upon his interview with Dr. Sommers-Flanagan. Be professional and concise for all nine areas.
- Explain the presenting problem for the referral and the identifying descriptors for Carl
- Identify any areas in your MSE that require follow-up data collection.
- Explain how using the cross-cutting measure would add to the information gathered.
- Identify elements of Dr. Sommer-Flanagan’s interview with Carl and his variations from the formal MSE
Describe skills Dr. Sommers-Flanagan uses to engage Carl during the assessment.
- What impact does the use of these skills seem to have on Carl?
- How do the skills affect rapport?
- Do Carl’s answers add to your ability to diagnose him in any specific way? Why or why not?
Finally, consider the following questions:
- What concerns would you have about Carl’s mannerisms in the interview or his spontaneous content and unusual beliefs?
- How would you address these mannerisms and beliefs?
- Would you discuss them with Carl now or in the future? Why?
Assignment: Conducting a Diagnostic Interview With a Mental Status Exam Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]
FINAL SHORT IDENTIFICATION EXAM from the book ( give me liberty ), history homework help Humanities Assignment Help
FINAL SHORT IDENTIFICATION EXAM
DUE BACK TO ME AT THE BEGINNING OF CLASS ON 5/18/2017
FIRST, from each of the chapters you have read since the mid-term (i.e. Foner, Give Me Liberty, chapters 9 – 15) select and simply list, in chapter order, the 5 (FIVE) most important short identification vocabulary terms that you would want your students to remember from the reading if you were teaching this course. This should give you a ‘Master List’ of 40 potential short identifications.
NEXT, from this ‘Master List’ pick the TOP TEN (10) that you think are most important for any student of American History to know and in concise individual paragraphs identify each one individually – i.e. tell me who or what it was; when, where and why it was historically significant – and, finally, why it is important enough to be included in your ‘Top Ten’ list.
Cesar Chavez; Martin Luther King, Robert Richardson, writing homework help Writing Assignment Help
Cesar Chavez; Martin Luther King, Robert Richardson.
Each of the above people contributed to America in the general area of racism. We have seen a movie in class on each one of them.
Your job now is to fully identify who they were and what they did.
– a) What issues were they dealing with?
– b) What methods did they use to try to make things better?
– c) Did they succeed in any or all of their efforts during their lifetimes?
– d) And looking back today, do you think their methods and efforts were wisely chosen?
– e) Did their efforts have any lasting effect?
Make sure you do the analysis asked for here. you will need to do further research, so use good sources — and list them in your bibliography!
Requirements. ( Please use website resources)
– Minimum 750 words
– Single space pages
– Also attached Draft ex) outline that your answers (a) through (e). ( Please label the letter for each topic)
In a 750-1,000 word paper, provide a detailed overview the organization and its advantages for members. Writing Assignment Help
Examine the importance of professional associations in nursing. Choose a professional nursing organization that relates to your specialty area, or a specialty area in which you are interested. In a 750-1,000 word paper, provide a detailed overview the organization and its advantages for members. Include the following:
- Describe the organization and its significance to nurses in the specialty area. Include its purpose, mission, and vision. Describe the overall benefits, or “perks,” of being a member.
- Explain why it is important for a nurse in this specialty field to network. Discuss how this organization creates networking opportunities for nurses.
- Discuss how the organization keeps its members informed of health care changes and changes to practice that affect the specialty area.
- Discuss opportunities for continuing education and professional development.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
1) 1. Advocacy
Explore the Advocacy page of the American Nurses Association (ANA) website.
2) 1. America Nurses Credentialing CenterExplore the America Nurses Credentialing Center website. In particular, familiarize yourself with the resources describing standards of practice.http://www.nursecredentialing.org/
3) List of Nursing OrganizationsExplore the “List of Nursing Organizations,” located on the Nurse.org website.https://nurse.org/orgs.shtml
What is the human soul? Writing Assignment Help
Write a reflection and synthesis paper about the human soul
Texts for the paper:
Platos five dialogues Grube, Hackett, 2002,
Platos Republic R. Waterfield, Oxford, 2009,
Aristotle De anima transl. Hugh Lawson-Tancred, Penguin Classics, 1987,
Aquinas Summa of the Summa, ed. Kreeft, Ignatius Press 1990,
(Elaborate on the topic) What is the human soul? Is the human soul real? Five arguments . Five counter arguments. Five examples including your own.
The outline to follow: Intro, 5 arguments, 5 counter arguments, 5 examples (including your own), conclusion
Use and discuss at least 3 authors from the books listed above. Those same authors used must have the books listed on the reference page. Use those authors chosen to talk about the human soul and their arguments on the topic.
Times new roman, double spaced, and MLA format.
Reference page (MLA format)