Research paper in kinesiology Health Medical Assignment Help

Task:

For this essay, you will work on an expository argument paper that is supported by research on a current issue in technology.

Topics:

1. Write a 1200+ word argument essay that discusses whether we should fear the rise of technology or are the critics of tech creating unnecessary hysteria?

2. Write a 1200+ word argument essay that addresses the question: Do you think we should embrace or fear AI technology in the workplace? Why/why not?

3. Write a 1200+ word argument essay that addresses the question: Do you think there should be stricter laws against Social Media and Websites collecting & selling “big data” on you? Why/Why not?

4. Write a 1200+ word argument essay that addresses the question: Should the Universal Declaration of Human Rights extend to robots or AI? Why/Why not?

5. Write a 1200+ word argument essay that addresses the question: Do you think tech companies have a responsibility to create environmentally conscious products? Why/why not?

6. Pick a topic you find interesting to take an argumentative stance on

Project Requirements and Breakdown

1. Must be at least 1200 words

2. Must contain 3 quotes from our class texts(TED talks, Descender, or any of the articles read in class)

https://www.ted.com/talks/sherry_turkle_connected_but_alone/up-next

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/18/artificial-intelligence-humans-computers

3. Must contain 3 outside sources

4. Must follow MLA in-text and Works Cited formulas

5. Should contain all the elements of an Essay

6. Have a Topic + Comment Thesis

7. Have a rebuttal

8. Say something new on the topic or bring a new perspective to the topic

A Successful Essay Will Have

Introduction:

* A title specific to the topic

* An attention-getter

* Background on the topic (please make it clear which prompt you are answering)

* End with your thesis

* A clearly stated thesis (your opinion – your 1-2 sentence response to the essay prompt) which speaks to the “so what” of the issue and is not merely a list-plan of development.

Body:

* Topic sentence that is related to the thesis

* Supporting evidence

* Quotes from the text (Remember to cite the quotes)

* Consideration of and rebuttal against the other side of the topic

Conclusion:

* DO NOT bring up a new topic

* A suggestion of the consequences of your position for society, readers, individuals, what you want to happen in the future, or how the author might feel about your position, etc.

Works Cited Page

• That cites all sources using current MLA guidelines.

MLA WORKS CITED EXAMPLES:

• Format:

Book: Single Author Author. Title. Place: Publisher, Date. Medium

Example:

Bolling, Linda. My Life with My Best Friend in Colorado. New York: Time-Life, 2008. Print.

Evaluation Criteria for Your Essay:

I will use the following criteria to evaluate your position paper:

1. Have you engaged the readers’ interest at the beginning and throughout the paper?
2. Have you chosen an arguable position and defined it carefully (e.g. placing the issue in its historical or cultural context, citing specific instances to make the issue seem less abstract, or establishing or redefining the terms of the debate)?
3. Have you organized your paper into an introduction, body (containing several paragraphs), and conclusion?
4. Have you included at the end of the introduction a thesis statement that asserts a clear, unequivocal position on the issue you have chosen and, possibly, forecasts the stages of the argument, identifying the main reason or reasons that you will develop and support in the essay?
5. Have you given reasons why readers should take your position seriously?
6. Have you organized your reasons into a logical order (e.g. placing the strongest reason last and the second-strongest reason first, with the other reasons in the middle)?
7. Have you supported each reason with examples, facts, analogies, statistics, anecdotes, or quotes from
8. authorities? Remember: you need 3 quotes from the readings.
9. Have you anticipated readers’ questions and their positions on an issue, counterarguing as needed?
10. Have you signaled explicitly the move from one topic to the next using forecasting statements, transitions, topic sentences, rhetorical questions, and/or summaries?
11. Have you cited at least 5 quotes in your essay, using MLA in-text (parenthetical) citation strategies correctly?
12. Have you integrated the sources into your essay, using signal phrases to introduce long quotations or incorporating shorter quotations into the sentences smoothly?
13. Have you included an MLA Works Cited at the end of your essay?
14. Are the sentences clear and correct?
15. Is the essay between 1200+ words. Longer papers will be returned for editing.

Final Case Study assignment:

This assignment is the same as Case Study 2 but it is now research paper. The paper should be 7-10 pages long. You need to analyze the case from 4 stakeholder perspectives, and you should include 1 philosophical ethical principle in your analysis from each stakeholder perspective. You should also apply 3 rules from Miller et al.’s 5 rules in your discussion. This should be the foundation of a discussion of the ethical/social issues in the case from a professional perspective.

You need to write on the following topics:

See Topics Sheet. If you decide on another topic ok it with me.

Steps in Ethical Case Analysis

1. Get the facts straight. Review the case. Briefly recap the details of the case at the beginning of your paper. You need to explain how your case is an example of e.g. Cyber Warfare, Cyber Espionage or Cyber Crime.

2. Identify the central stakeholders in the case.

3. Identify the technical problems in the case.

4. Identify the Ethical problem or problems in the case.

5. Identify the Social problem or problems in the case.

6. Solve the technical, ethical and social problems using both technical, ethical standards.

7. Will your solution to the problem withstand criticism from the perspectives of both a variety of Ethical principles, code of conduct, and Professionals in your field?

8. What recommendations can you make about the problems in the case based upon your ethical analysis?

When you construct your analysis be sure and remember that we are assigning a 7-10 page analysis. With this length limitation it is important to realize that you will probably only be able to look at the problems in the case from an IT professional’s perspective. If you try to analyze every stakeholder perspective you will probably exceed the length limitation.

Grading and Evaluation of Papers

1. What are the objectives of the papers?

A.

i. To become sensitized to the ethical issues in Engineering and Information Technology.

ii. Learn how to analyze a case.

iii. Learn how to identify the major stakeholders in a case.

iv. Learn how to identify the technical problems in a case.

v. Learn how to identify the ethical problems in a case.

vi. Learn how to apply ethical principles to a case.

vii. Learn how to make recommendations in a case based upon ethical analysis.

B.

a. Critical thinking

i. Did you identify and focus on the crucial material and facts in the case?

ii. Did you support claims you make about the case with facts?

iii. Did you think about the case from a variety of stakeholder perspectives?

b. Ethical analysis

i. Did you identify the central Ethical problem(s)

ii. Did you conduct a well thought out ethical analysis by applying 3 ethical principles?

iii. Did you conduct a well thought out ethical analysis by applying 3 principles from a code of ethics in your analysis?

iv. Did you justify ethical judgments with accurate facts and ethical principles?

v. Did you think about the case from a variety of ethical perspectives?

How will your papers be assessed?

Evaluations of Papers (Percentages)

A. The Case Recap (.10)

i. Do you highlight the key points in the case?

a. Are the facts in the case accurate?

b. Did you focus on the crucial aspects of the case?

c. Did you avoid including non essential or superfluous information?

B. Stakeholders (.10)

i. Who are the primary and secondary stakeholders in the case?

ii. Did you clearly identify from which stakeholder perspective you are analyzing the material in the case?

a.From whose perspective are you analyzing the case?

C. What is the central technical problem? (.10)

i. How is the central technical problem related to the ethical problems in the case?

D. What is/are the ethical problem/problems (.10) and what are the social issues (.10)? Total (.20)

i. What ethical problems do you see in the case?

ii. What is the central ethical problem?

iii. Why is this the central ethical problem?

E. What ethical principles/what principles from Miller’s 5 rules, apply to the central ethical problem? (.30)

i. Do you correctly define the ethical principles you use?

ii. Have you correctly applied the ethical principles you use?

iii. Do the principles you use withstand obvious criticisms from other ethical perspectives?

F. What are your recommendations? (.20)

i. Are your recommendations based upon your ethical analysis?

ii. Do your recommendations link to your ethical analysis?

iii. Rather than stating the obvious ( e. g. this problem could have been easily solved if … ) what do you recommend for similar cases in the future?

Final Paper Topics:

Cyber bullying/Tyler Clementi/Zoe Johnson/Carla Jamerson

Cybercrime

Sexting

Anonymous/ Vigilanteism/Online Protests

Project Chanology

Operation Payback

Operation Aurora

Operation Cast Lead

Anonymous and Arab Spring

Anonymous and ISIS

North Korea and Sony Pictures

Apple v. US Govt

Assange, Wikileaks and Collateral Murder/Assange, Wikileaks and DNC/ Assange, Wikileaks and French Election

Snowden Revelations

Viruses

Morris worm

Duqu

Flame

Gauss

Medstar Hospital Attack (Ransomware)

Cyber Espionage

Exfiltration

Attacks

Cyber Security

Hacker Black Hat

Hacker White Hate

Hacker Gray Hat

Cyber Terrorism

Al Qaeda (Online Terrorism)

ISIS (Use of Social Media)

Cyberwarfare

Estonia

Georgia

Ukraine

Operation Buckshot Yankee

Eligible Receiver

Solar Sunrise

Moonlight Maze

Titan Rain

Stuxnet

Topics (Find case Studies)

Algorithyms

Autonomous Cars

Fake News #pizzagate, Sandy Hook, Facebook and Fake News, DNC hack

Internet of Things

Robotics

Biometrics

Big Data

Virtual Reality

Weapons system

Presidential use of Twitter

Hacking the F-35

Artificial Intelligence

USF has launched a Citizen Data Science Certificate program for the undergraduate students at the MUMA college of business. This program is a joint program with Tableau. Please refer to this Tableau presentation (Links to an external site.) or the video (Links to an external site.) to learn more about the program.

Tableau Assignment (i) Use Tableau to analyze a dataset to tell data-driven stories with visualizations, building a dashboard to show your insights. (ii) Create a video that highlights your insights and findings, and post to YouTube as an unlisted video. (iii) Submit the YouTube URL of your video to Canvas.

1. A Tableau dashboard of at least 3 visualizations. Creating the visualizations alone without having them together in one view defeats the purpose of using Tableau.
2. The dashboard should be interactive: clicking on the filters and the visualizations themselves should change the data in the dashboard.
3. The video should be at least 3 minutes.
4. The video should include: a brief introduction (a few seconds), an explanation of the dataset and the assignment (less than a minute), and the rest should be an explanation of multiple insights found while navigating the dashboard.
5. The link should be accessible from the internet, no recorded video files.
6. The video should be recorded from a laptop using video recording software. Phones are not allowed for recording.

For detailed instructions, see the links below on creating dashboards and posting a video.

• Download Tableau (Product Key: TC2E-7767-5EC0-5D75-B21B)
• Free Training Videos (From Tableau) (Links to an external site.), Lynda from USF (Links to an external site.)
• Sample Dashboards
• How to create a video and post it to YouTube as an unlisted video

Each student will have the opportunity to analyze a piece of persuasive material and present their findings to the class. Projects will vary in nature but all will entail the student being able to classify the artifact as propaganda or rhetoric, and support their position using the concepts covered in the course. Project will be presented briefly the last four classes of term. Projects not presented and/or submitted on their assigned day will be subject to a 10 point-per-class meeting penalty.

Project Options:

Individual Option 1: Transcript analysis

Select a PERSUASIVE Ted talk from https://www.ted.com (Links to an external site.)and confirm your selection with Professor Michaud before starting on your project (no matter how last-minute! I want you to have something solid to work with).

Your final submitted project will be a discussion of rhetoric in action: how a Ted Talk contributes to public discussion about issues that are important to us as a society. Your final project should address this larger question and include 1) a summary of the talk and provide background on the speaker, the exigence for the subject and purpose of the talk, the constraints associated with the subject, and the findings from your analysis; and 2) a notated transcript of the talk that highlights 2a) the anchors on which the argument hinges; 2b) the emotional, credibility, and logical appeals employed by the rhetor—including any genre-specific appeals to reason; and 2c) stylistic assessments based on Aristotle’s rules of good rhetorical style.

Your 5-6-minute presentation to the class should include elements from your summary as well as to highlight examples from your analysis for the purpose of highlighting rhetoric in action.

Individual Option 2: Analyze a campaign

Select any advertising campaign and confirm it with Professor Michaud. Ideas can be found at AdAge’s top campaigns* (Links to an external site.), also listed below, or other advertising or public relations campaign.

(Your final submitted project will be a persua