Research proposal Children at War Humanities Assignment Help

For your Final Project, you will create a treatment plan to a scenario featuring an offender with multiple related factors (e.g., gender, ethnicity, type of offense, and age). See the scenarios provided in the Final Project Scenarios document located in the resources for this week.

Your Final Project must be presented as a 12- to 15-page (not including references, title page, or abstract), double-spaced, APA-formatted paper. Please use 10- or 12-point, Times New Roman or Courier font. Reference citations should come from peer-reviewed journals, reputable periodicals, and non-commercial websites. Please note that Wikipedia is not considered a scholarly reference and is not accepted as a citable source.

In your Final Project, you must:

• Identify which scenario you selected to use for your Final Project.
• Explain the offender category(ies) that concurs with the scenario client and discern the treatment considerations inherent in this category(ies).
• Describe the multicultural factors (e.g., age, gender, and ethnicity) evident in the scenario and explain how these factors affect treatment and treatment approach(es).
• Describe the treatment approach(es) and/or programs you would use with the offender and explain why.
• Describe any legal and ethical issues that you might consider in the treatment of your selected offender and explain how you would address these issues.
• Describe the model you would use to measure treatment outcomes and explain why you selected this model.

The scenario I would like is:

Scott is presently serving a 15-year state sentence for the conviction of armed
robbery, possession of cocaine, and assault on a police officer. When Scott was in
the custody of the county jail awaiting trial on these charges, he was found to be in
possession of child pornography. He was charged with 1 felony count of
possession of child pornography and received a 12-month sentence for this
conviction. Scott has served 11-1/2 years of his sentence and is scheduled to be
released on parole in 1-1/2 years. He has been denied parole each time he was
eligible because the board did not see “sufficient remorse” for his crimes. Scott has
been referred to the therapeutic staff to help him prepare for his release.
Scott is a 47-year-old Caucasian male. He has never been married and has
fathered no children per his report. Scott has lived the majority of his life in
correctional settings starting when he was placed in juvenile detention centers at
the age of 12 through his release at the age of 19. At the age of 20, Scott was sent
to prison for 5 years after being convicted of assaulting his girlfriend. He served 18
months of this sentence and was released to the community on parole. Scott was
returned to prison after 2 months of release due to refusing to participate in the
parole process. He completed this sentence and was subsequently released. Scott
remained out of prison for the next 3 to 4 years and was “bouncing from place to
place, just getting high, living life, and enjoying.” He was arrested and convicted of
armed robbery, which resulted in a 5-year sentence. Scott was released after 2-1/2
years and then was arrested for the current charges.
Scott reports a long history of substance abuse that started when he was 8 years
old. He started drinking alcohol with his older brother and reports “loving it from the
first sip.” Scott also reports using a wide variety of drugs and says he “loves being
high.” Although he says he understands that drugs have had a detrimental impact
on his life and have kept him from reaching any potential, he further cites “being
high keeps me alive.” Scott has never attended a drug or alcohol program,
although it has been recommended and court ordered in the past. Upon presentation, Scott tells the therapist he “is a lost cause” and wishes every
day he would die. He acknowledges these thoughts of death as being a welcome
relief but cites no plans to end his own life and has no reported or documented
suicide attempts. Scott advises that he has no friends other than the ones he
makes in prison. He is estranged from his entire family and does not wish to be
reunited with any of his extended family. If they were reunited, Scott is concerned
he would just create difficulties for them.
Finally, Scott tells the therapist that he does not wish to hurt anyone else in the
future. He reports significant difficulties with controlling his temper and is
concerned he will accidentally kill someone. Scott also reports a “sexual addiction”
to pictures of “all sorts of people.” He does not believe this is a major problem
because he would never act on his fantasies.

A good critical analysis requires the reader to think, question, analyze, and evaluate the subject of analysis. When writers do a critical analysis of other writings, they should not only read the article they are critiquing thoroughly but also do some critical thinking on various aspects of writing as a way to evaluate the article. Remember that a critical analysis is written not merely to provide the readers a report on the article but also to evaluate the worth of the article.The critiquemust first demonstrate that he/she has made a sincere attempt at understanding the content, structure, and the rhetorical dimensions of the article, such as the purpose, occasion,target audience, etc., before he/she attempts at critiquing the article. Lacking this, the critical analysis may come off sounding biased and partial; hence, losing its credibility.

Most critical writings begin with a content summary of the article that is being evaluated, followed by points of analysis, and concluded with an overall evaluation of the entire article.Forthe critical analysis assignment in this class, you are required to write a minimum of 750 words critical analysis on the article that you have previously chosen. You must present your analysisof the article by reading it in class before turning the analysis in, for a grade. You must also be able to present your views and justify your evaluation of the article in the ensuing discussion.

Required Structure for the Critical Analysis Paper:

1. Summary of the article that is being critiqued:

• Must be concise and not longer than one paragraph long.

• Must present the author’s thesis accurately

• Must demonstrate complete comprehension of the text.

• Must include some background information about the article if it’s available, such as author, title, publication, purpose, target audience, occasion, etc.

2. 3 critical points of analysis.

• Analysis points: Author’s Purpose, Claim or Thesis, Point of View, Assumptions, Organizational Strategy, Argumentation Style, Strength of Evidence/ Support, Language (Diction, WordChoice, etc.,) Warrants, Audience Appeal, Author’s Credibility, Credibility of Evidence/ Support, Validity of Argumentation/ Claims, Use of Appeal (Logic, Emotion, and Authority,) Effectiveness, etc.

• All critical analysis must evaluate the article’s thesis/ claim as one of the three analysis points. Writers may choose the two other analysis points from the list above or any other points of argument of their choice.

• Each analysis point must have its own claim.

• Each claim must be supported by textual evidence or references.

3. Evaluation of the overall impact of the article:

• Did the article have a positive impact?

• Was the article convincing?

• Were the arguments logical?

• Is there any evidence of dishonesty?

• Were there emotional pleas? Were these pleas acceptable?

• Did the author make any assumptions? Are they honest, acceptable assumptions?

• Was the author sincere or truthful in his claims?

• Did the article offer a new, meaningful way of seeing the subject or is the author merely parroting all that we already know?

• On the whole, was the article a worthy read?

Here is attached revised chapter one, need nothing to do with it. Also chapter 2 of my research and its all about the methodology, mixing design, and test and experiment. What I need you to do is to is copy it and move it under chapter one to organize the whole work, develop the table of content, revise what I did in chapter two and rewrite it in more academic way also support everything with refrences, last is to write the last part of chapter 2 which is test and experiments. I did 3 experiment and I need to summarize all of them. You should to write about each experiment 1 and half to 3 pages so total of 3 experiment are between 5 to 12 pages. I attached the ASTM and other file for the experiments and you should use them as the main source. Please make sure when you done the whole work and add chapter 2 to 1 please make sure that the plagiarism should to be less that 5% which is the rule of my university. if you have any questions please ask. Check my work very clear and make sure it be written in very strong academic way.

This class if for beginers so i don’t expect you to make alot of effort to answer in depth for these questions except for the hypothesis please be careful and pay attention to the questions as im going to make presentation about it.

So you have to answer these questions that attached in the file.

and answer these questions