Saint Mary University Strategy The Trail Shop Business Level Strategy Paper Writing Assignment Help

Just like the last brochure but this one is “hostile audience brochure”

Topic from my previous essays was the health affects instagram brings to young adults.

In your previous projects for this class, you were writing to audiences who were, at some level, people with power and expertise.Your academic audience consisted of people with significant authority and knowledge as members of the academic community, and your letter was addressed to a person in a position to bring about change, thus a person with authority and expertise, if not in your field, in another field.

The civic discourse project is written to address an audience that does not have that level of authority and expertise.These are “ordinary” people who are affected by your topic – people who have a family member struggling or who are worried about their own personal situation, people who have concerns about their neighborhood or state or country.Your goal is to help those people find a way to understand and start on a path that would solve these concerns.

You will be writing two trifold brochures.

The second one must be addressed to a public, non-expert audience who you think would be likely to disagree with your position on the topic, and it must encourage that audience to reconsider their position.

Keep in mind that addressing a text to a public audience does not mean addressing it to what is sometimes called a “general” audience.There is no such thing as a general audience.Instead, you will need to think carefully about the personal characteristics of your audience: their age, education level, socio-economic level, political and religious and cultural affiliations, gender and ethnic and sexual identification, their profession, their physical locations – all these and potentially other characteristics are important to bear in mind in order to write persuasive piece of civic discourse.

Trifold brochures have specific genre expectations of their own, including the ways in which they use images, evidence, language, and visual presentation.Be sure to view the Zoom lecture on civic discourse and to review the sample and criteria of evaluation for this assignment.

PLEASE ALREADY HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING OF THESE PRINCIPLES.

First, what is the undue burden standard? What was its moral and legal justification? How has it been judicially applied? What are the moral/philosophical and legal/constitutional criticisms of this standard? Are these criticisms valid–why or why not? Finally, do you think it should be the Court’s standard to apply going forward? Why or why not? Students are encouraged to go beyond mere summary to develop their own arguments and insights. MLA or footnote citation is acceptable. Write with economy, but thoroughly answer the prompt. Selective quoting is fine, but overquoting should be avoided. 1-inch margins, 12 point font, submitted through Canvas as a Word .doc file.

Discussions 1 to 10: Organization Leadership and Decision Making

Discussions 11 to 22: Emerging Threats and Counter Measures

Discussion 23: Analyzing and Visualizing Data

Instructions:

Need 23 Responses

Need a minimum of 150 words for each response

Need 2 PEER Reviewed APA References

In Response need to cover

What did you learn from this posting?

What additional questions do you have after reading the posting?

What clarification do you need regarding the posting?

What differences or similarities do you see between your idea and this posting?

Outline:

Response 1: 150 words, Reference 1, Reference 2

Response 2: 150 words, Reference 1, Reference 2

.

.

.

Response 23: 150 words, Reference 1, Reference 2

The case analyses should be approached as though you are a global marketing manager assigned the task of assessing the situation and presenting three long-term strategies to resolve the concerns addresses in the case. I AM NOT LOOKING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE CASE.

Based on your understanding and external research on the current situation (see document attached), DESCRIBE AND DEFEND 3 strategies that would revitalize and/or improve their GLOBAL strategic objectives. Please do not limit yourself to the specifics of the case when formulating your strategies. Think ‘BIG PICTURE’ (ethical and cultural concerns, internal/external factors, complementary products/industries, sustainability issues, process improvements, etc.).

Your strategic recommendations should explain IN DETAIL the logic and process behind implementing such initiatives. Please do not provide vague recommendations. APA FORMAT; 6 FULL PAGES (AROUND 1,500 WORDS); DOUBLE SPACED.

Unlike the Toulmin and Rogerian methods where one side is argued over another, the Middle Ground argument mediates between two sides of an issue hopefully arriving at a compromise solution between two positions.

Please include both answers in one initial post with extra space between them.

Middle Ground Discussion: For this discussion, choose an issue that you wrote about previously in this course (either your Toulmin or Rogerian essay). Let the class know your previous claim and briefly how you proved this claim in your essay. After this brief review discussion, discuss how you would have approached this particular topic if you were to write a Middle Ground argument, instead of a Toulmin or Rogerian argument. Would you have adjusted your claim? If so, what sort of adjustment would you need? Would you have to find additional sources about your topic in order to prove this new claim? Is a middle ground solution a more practical solution to your chosen issue?

In your responses to your classmates on the Middle Ground discussion, let your classmate know which argument appears to be stronger: the original claim or the new middle ground claim. Please make sure to explain why. If you disagree with both claims, that’s fine – let your classmate know why you disagree in a bias-free manner.

Concluding Remarks: Secondly, during this course, you have read quite a few arguments, critiqued some of these arguments, and written essays using various methods of argumentation. Take a moment to consider your future courses at APUS and/or your current/future career field. How can you incorporate what you have learned into your career or education?

In your responses to your classmates on their concluding remarks, feel free to compare your approach to your classmates. You may also help students find additional ways to use argumentation/persuasion in their chosen educational/career field.

Minimum 250 words answer.

Classmate #1:

Good evening class,

Middle Ground Discussion: For my Rogerian essay, I wrote about mandatory sexual education curriculum for the youth. My claim: “Sexual Education courses should be implemented in Middle and High School curriculum to educate the youth on necessary precautions and consequences that need to be considered before becoming sexually active.” I proved my claim throughout the essay by focusing on the common ground of wanting the youth to be safe and healthy. I also gave facts on how successful the classes are on positively influencing adolescent’s decision making and health.

For a middle ground, I would keep my claim and style the same except I would emphasize how the youth can have the option to “opt out.” I would need to find additional sources to see if there are supplemental classes that the youth can participate in, instead of the sexual education course, and how effective it is. Eventually, I would like the supplemental course and the original course to intersect somewhere in the curriculum to keep all of adolescents on the same page. In my opinion, I don’t believe the middle ground solution is more practical. I think it leaves room for unclear guidance and results in the knowledge among the youth varying too much. Ultimately, I believe it would do more harm than good to the overall goal of the sexual education program.

Concluding Remarks: I remember being extremely nervous to take this course because it had been over 2 years since I completed Engl101. Now, I am relieved I’ve made it this far! I wasn’t familiar with the Toulmin or Rogerian method before taking this course. Personally, the Toulmin method is my favorite because it has a strong standing if you follow the structure correctly. This method is beneficial to my current career as law enforcement because it gives a strong argument by acknowledging the weaknesses of it. However, the Rogerian would also be helpful in my career when I’m trying to win “the hearts and minds” of my audience with certain topics. I’m not sure when I’ll take another writing course but I’m glad I have a lot to take away from this course.

It has been a pleasure working alongside all of you! If you have any suggestions on what courses would be best to follow up after completing this one, I am all ears!

Classmate #2:

My Rogerian essay topic was on early childhood vaccinations with the goal of proving that vaccinations should be mandatory being that the benefits outweigh the few side effects. I researched data and facts to demonstrate the safety of the vaccines and the need for keeping children safe against deadly diseases the vaccines were created to prevent. Continued research showed one of the biggest reasons parents refused to have their children vaccinated was the belief that vaccinations could be the cause of autism or other unexplained, but increasingly common medical conditions; although no other sources or published studies could be found that proved these dangers were linked. Additionally, known toxins originally found in early vaccination have since been removed to help ensure the vaccines safety. To write this topic as a middle ground essay versus advocating that vaccines should be mandatory, the argument would be reconstructed to state that the importance of childhood vaccinations is keeping the children safe from severe and deadly diseases. The revised claim would state that keeping children safe from diseases should be mandatory; whether through vaccination, natural immunization or other alternative options. More sources would need to be researched to support the new claim. My original claim of vaccines needing to be mandatory was more practical as the other options do not work as well and could pose a higher risk for severe side effects. With this class I have learned a lot over the last eight weeks and feel that I have gained new skills in writing. This new knowledge will be used as I continue working on my degree, as I will have many more papers to write in the future.

Minimum 150 words answer to each.

Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two quantitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part II” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, and reference content from the study in your responses.

Use the practice problem and two quantitative, peer-reviewed research articles you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two quantitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

PICOT question: In patients with central lines does the use of CHG wipes [daily] vs. standard baths decrease central line associated blood stream infections (CLABSI’s) over 3 month.

P: Infection in patients with central lines.

I: Use of CHG wipes in patients with central lines.

C: No use of CHG wipes in patients with central lines.

O: Decreased infections rates

T: 3 month