Strayer University Implementing a Strategic Plan Capstone Project Business Finance Assignment Help

Authorities in every academic discipline share certain expectations and norms for publication in their scholarly journals and texts. While specialists in some disciplines uphold a strict standard of academic writing, other experts allow a more flexible rhetorical style. In general, however, academic writers strive to influence their discourse communities by following the expected norms.

While communities of scholars strive to ensure quality in their disciplines, they also recognize a certain level of subjectivity in determining the quality of academic writing. Analyzing each author’s quality of evidence, awareness of the target audience, and potential for personal bias will help you determine the appropriateness of books, articles, and other documents that you read. For this Assignment, you analyze scholarly articles. As you review the articles, consider the ways that the different backgrounds of the authors and their readers may affect both the creation and the interpretation of the writing.

To prepare:

• Identify at least 3 peer review elements within each of the articles by Leslie-Bole and Perramond, Piotrowski, and Rivera and Ward.
• Use specific examples to explain which article you consider to be the most professional and well written.
• See the “Assignment Rubric” in “Course Information” before you begin.
• The word limit for this assignment is 500-600 words. Use complete sentences instead of bullet points.

• Analyze the article you selected by doing each of the following:
  • Evaluate the quality of evidence, appropriateness of the content and writing style for the target audience, and the author’s potential bias. Then, explain whether or not the article meets professional standards for scholarly writing.
  • Explain how various audiences might perceive the author’s intent and message.
  • Explain how you might revise the article to make it more appropriate for an international audience.

https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/20790

DQ #4: Pick the four ground rule topics for project teams that you believe are the most important. Tell why you believe each is so critical, explain how they are related to each other, and give at least two specific suggestions for each.

Write a substantive response refer to chapter – 6 and answer above question of at least 600 words and reference the textbook and at least one (1) scholarly journal article attached. The journal article should provide substantive support to your answer.

A response such as “I agree” or “I liked what was said” is NOT substantive, i request you not to use those words in the summary, Build your answer on your based more on journal article.

Part 1: Interest Rates

Many managers do not understand the various ways that interest rates can affect business decisions. For example, if your company decided to build a plant with a 30-year life and short-term debt financing (renewed annually), the cost of the plant could skyrocket if interest rates were to return to their previous highs of 12% to 14%. On the other hand, locking into high, long-term rates could be very costly also with a long period when low short-term interest rates were to be available. As you can see, the ability to know your economic environment and its impact on projected interest rates can be crucial to making good financing decisions.

Describe two to three macroeconomic factors that influence interest rates in general. Explain the effects of each factor on interest rates.

Now think about the industry in which you are employed or one in which you have past experience. To what macroeconomic factors is your industry most sensitive?

Describe two contemporary factors that seem to be impacting your industry today, and identify their impacts on the interest rates experienced within your chosen industry.

Part 2: Stock Valuation, Risk and Returns

Stock valuation

Dividend Discount Model Stock Valuation

How to value a company using discounted cash flow (DCF)

Stock Valuation and Investment Decisions

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BIIiUyr3-w&feature=emb_title Risk and return video

Present a detailed discussion of what you learned about stock valuation. Provide examples of how your company has used the concepts. Do you believe financing a company’s operation using stock is better than financing with bonds? Why or why not? Support your discussion with a numerical example.

Based on the materials presented in the “Risk and Return” video, present a discussion on why the materials are important in financial decision making. How would you incorporate risk and return in your financing decisions?

Assignment: Email Harassment

Suppose you are an internal investigator for a large software development company. The Human Resources Department has requested you investigate the accusations that one employee has been harassing another over both the corporate Exchange email system and Internet-based Google Gmail email.

Prepare a report in you:

1. Create an outline of the steps you would take in examining the email accusations that have been identified.
2. Describe the information that can be discovered in email headers and determine how this information could potentially be used as evidence in the investigation.
3. Analyze differences between forensic analysis on the corporate Exchange system and the Internet-based Google Gmail email system. Use this analysis to determine the challenges that exist for an investigator when analyzing email sent from an Internet-based email system outside of the corporate network.
4. Select one (1) software-based forensic tool for email analysis that you would utilize in this investigation. Describe its use, features, and how it would assist in this scenario.
5. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date.

Note: Use quality resources and assignment will be check for plagiarism.

• Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

1. Create an outline of the steps you would take in examining the email accusations that have been identified.–

Levels of Achievement:

Novice 0 (0%) – 21.56 (17.25%)

Competent 21.88 (17.5%) – 24.69 (19.75%)

Proficient 25 (20%) – 27.81 (22.25%)

New Column4 28.12 (22.5%) – 31.25 (25%)

2. Describe the information that can be discovered in email headers and determine how this information could potentially be used as evidence in the investigation.–

Levels of Achievement:

Novice 0 (0%) – 12.94 (10.35%)

Competent 13.12 (10.5%) – 14.81 (11.85%)

Proficient 15 (12%) – 16.69 (13.35%)

New Column4 16.88 (13.5%) – 18.75 (15%)

3. Analyze differences between forensic analysis on the corporate Exchange system and Google Gmail email system. Use this analysis to determine the challenges that exist for an investigator when analyzing email sent from an Internet-based email system outside of the corporate network.–

Levels of Achievement:

Novice 0 (0%) – 21.56 (17.25%)

Competent 21.88 (17.5%) – 24.69 (19.75%)

Proficient 25 (20%) – 27.81 (22.25%)

New Column4 28.12 (22.5%) – 31.25 (25%)

4. Select one (1) software-based forensic tool for email analysis that you would utilize in this investigation. Describe its use, features, and how it would assist in this scenario.–

Levels of Achievement:

Novice 0 (0%) – 17.25 (13.8%)

Competent 17.5 (14%) – 19.75 (15.8%)

Proficient 20 (16%) – 22.25 (17.8%)

New Column4 22.5 (18%) – 25 (20%)

5. Cite 3 references.–

Levels of Achievement:

Novice 0 (0%) – 4.31 (3.45%)

Competent 4.38 (3.5%) – 4.94 (3.95%)

Proficient 5 (4%) – 5.56 (4.45%)

New Column4 5.62 (4.5%) – 6.25 (5%)

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements–

Levels of Achievement:

Novice 0 (0%) – 8.62 (6.9%)

Competent 8.75 (7%) – 9.88 (7.9%)

Proficient 10 (8%) – 11.12 (8.9%)

New Column4 11.25 (9%) – 12.5 (10%)