Teach something from Ethn104(Pacific Islands Studies) to a broader public Humanities Assignment Help

To meet the objectives of this assignment, you must complete the following course activities.

All activities are found in the Table of Contents:

• Part I: 3-day Food Record
• Part II: Diet and Wellness Plus Diet Analysis
• Part III: Create a Medical Family Tree
• Part IV: Interpretation
• Rubric for the Project
• Completed Capstone Project Submission

You will need to submit the following documents:

• Part I: 3-day Food Record – table in a word document
• Part II: Diet and Wellness Plus Reports -(see instructions for how to create the following pdf files)
  1. Intake Spread sheet – pdf file
  2. Intake vs goals – pdf file
• Part III: Create a Medical Family Tree – table in a word document
• Part IV: Interpretation – table in a word document

Please only use the file formats listed above. Failure to follow directions will result in REDUCED points.

A. Dr. Martin Luther King’s antiwar sermon, “A Time to Break Silence,” which he delivered on 30 April 1967 in the Riverside Church in NYC. The sermon may be found at http://www.deanza.edu/faculty/swensson/king.html

In an extended argumentative essay using outside research (at least three sources)write a response piece which tells how you feel about one of the two works. Try not to do too much–King’s sermon has eight major points–only deal with a small piece of the sermon, or a statement of King’s within the sermon. On the other hand Galloway’s prologue is a coherent, short work and you can probably deal with it in its entirety.

This is an emotional response, a textual response, or a logical response. WHATEVER THE NATURE OF YOUR RESPONSE YOU MUST HAVE ALL OF THE PARTS AND PIECES OF THE ARGUMENTATIVE THEME AS EXHAUSTIVELY ENUMERATED IN UNIT 4.So you mus develop your own thesis and main supporting points and write your own RELIABLE argument. Is this good writing or is it fantasy? What makes it good or bad? Feel free to respond critically in any fashion that you choose.(Note: The best response will be a logical response using terms that you are studying in Unit Five, Logic.)As usual, you must have a Works Cited for the text and one for your peer editor. 1200 words minimum

Larry Landlord has recently renovated an apartment and has put it on the market to be rented for $800.00 a month. Larry Landlord has been in business for approximately five (5) years and has had both positive and negative experiences with tenants. Larry Landlord is hoping to find a good, long-term tenant for his apartment. Roger Renter saw Larry’s sign for the apartment for rent and thought the location and the apartment would be perfect. Roger met Larry to look at the apartment and Roger fell in love with it. All of the interior fixtures had been replaced and the unit had a nice large closet. Roger noticed that although newly painted, the exterior of the apartment did show a little bit of wear. Because of the condition of the exterior of the building, Roger asked Larry about any roof leaks. Larry stated that he had never had a leak and was not aware of any leaks.

Roger and Larry entered into a valid contract for the rental of the apartment. (Note: The issue of whether or not a contract exists is NOT part of this question. For purposes of this question assume the contract is valid and there are no issues with the contract.)

Roger Renter was very happy in his new location; the apartment was quiet and the neighbors were friendly. Larry Landlord was also very happy because Roger Renter was a model tenant. Roger Renter paid on time and was quiet and respectful to other tenants.

The part of the country where Roger rented was rainy in the summertime. Roger rented and moved into the apartment in October. In June, a tremendous rainstorm occurred and Roger’s roof began to leak. The leak was minor at first and Roger merely put a trash can under the leak and had no other issues that month. When handing over his monthly rent check, Roger told Larry about the small leak. Larry thanked Roger for letting him know about the leak and told Roger he would have it fixed.

The next month the rains came again and the leak grew larger in Roger’s apartment. Roger was not home at the time of the rain and therefore the leak damaged some of Roger’s furniture. Roger called Larry to let him know that there was a leak and asked when it might be fixed. Roger also stated that he thought Larry had fixed the roof. Larry curtly stated, “When it rains, sometimes it pours. When it pours, sometimes it leaks.” Roger did not like Larry’s tone or response and called back to ask when the roof might be fixed. Larry stated, “When I get to it.” The following day, Roger sent Larry a note about the roof leak and asked Larry to please address the issue.

The week before the rent was due, another rainstorm occurred and the leak was even larger. This time the leak damaged Roger’s clothing, furniture, and some precious items he had inherited from family members. Roger called Larry and asked Larry to fix roof immediately. Larry responded in a similar and condescending manner. Roger hung up the phone and threw his baseball bat against the wall, damaging the drywall and knocking out an electrical socket.

Since it was the rainy season, Roger knew it would rain again and therefore simply moved his items away from the leak and did nothing to help mitigate the damage from the leaking roof.

Larry came into the apartment to investigate the leak and found damage from not only the leak but also from the thrown baseball bat. Roger states that the baseball bat damage was a direct result of Larry’s inability to fix the leak based on his anger from Larry’s curt response.

Suppose you are a mediator. In five to seven (5-7) pages discuss the rights and responsibilities of the landlord and the tenant in which you:

1. Explore the legal rights and responsibilities of the tenant and the landlord.
2. Decide whether or not the landlord and / or the tenant had a legal duty to mitigate damages.
3. Determine whether or not Larry has legal grounds to evict Roger. Explain why or why not.
4. Describe whether or not Roger has a legal obligation to pay for the damage he caused and determine whether or not Larry would be liable for any direct damage.
5. Support each response with facts presented in the scenario.
6. Use proper legal terminology throughout your responses.
7. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as quality academic resources.
8. Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:
   • Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
   • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
   • Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.

“For this assignment, I ask that you answer two out of the three following questions. You can pick the two you find easiest. Here they are:

1. What is a hedonic calculus? Why are consequences required for a hedonic calculus to function? What is an eschatology? Why do we need an eschatology in order to use a hedonic calculus? How does this necessity undermine utilitarianism?

2. For Kant, what are the two determining factors upon the will? What does he say is the condition for the worthiness to be happy? What, then, is the motivation to have reason determine one’s will? How does the desire for the worthiness to be happy affect the interpretation of one’s own intentions?

3. What is Levinas’ definition of politics? How is it that utilitarianism and deontology are, in this sense, political? What does it mean to say that politics should instead be based upon morality? Why does Levinas think we are nevertheless forced into doing politics?”

* Please Answer Two of these questions. There are inside questions for each question, so please make the answer as a paragraph that includes the answers for the inside questions.

* Important book is Totality and Infinity ( Levinas).