the adventures of Indiana Jones movies, homework help Humanities Assignment Help

1) You will be selecting the most interesting and noteworthy points you located in this Unit’s readings and post on the Discussion board and engage in discussion with your peers. Make sure you relate your discussion points to a Perspective-Make sure you relate your ideas to Social Class, Race and Ethnicity, Gender Roles, Religion, Political Affiliation, Crisis Impaired, and Socio Economic or some other areal of interest.

Your initial Post addressing should be 150 words minimum

Questions on readings to submit :

2)“No One’s A Mystery”

What does the diary represent in the story and in particular it being locked?

What other connections to the locked diary do you see?

Do you see a network of interconnectivity (between the situations and the characters) here

and what does this interconnectivity reveal?

3)“The Man Upstairs” David Sedaris

Is this really anything to do with God or is that way too simple?

What did the article make you think about in your own life?

4)“Boys on the Side” Hanna Rosin

What are you impressions of this piece?

What did you know about this before you read it? Did this change any ideas you had about

this phenomena?

What strikes you the most in this piece and why do you feel it made that impression on you?

Write a paragraph.

5)Poems:

Which of the poems do you find most interesting and why?

What issue do you see if the poem you picked that is reflective of an issue from society?

6) On the Discussion Board Unit 5 # 2 By now you have completed the readings for Unit 5. Write a short 150-200-word analysis of one of the texts where you discuss at least one aspect you see in the piece. Use at least one quote to support your analysis. Connect what you see to disciplinary perspective you have identified. Use MLA and paragraphing.

.The two questions is student answer question and I need to respond with resournces:

1. The interteam challenge I was involved in is similar to the situation Priscilla described. I was hired as a non-supervisory team lead at a previous agency. I was excited about the position and understood my role. My job was to track workload and workflow to ensure even distribution of tasks and to minimize any bottlenecks in processes. However, the HR Director who hired me to lead her team of generalists did not communicate this to them prior to me coming on board. A few weeks later after making huge efforts to get to know everyone, I found out that the team assumed I was hired to supervise them, and they were not happy to have an additional layer of supervision in their chain of command. It was then that I had an ‘aha!’ moment and began to understand the lukewarm reception I received when I came on board, the unwillingness to collaborate and the “who does she think she is” attitude toward me from a couple of senior team members.

As Vos and van der Zee mentioned in their article, in-groups are much more willing to assist others in their groups (2011). To the team, I was an out-group member. But, through improved communication, the HR Director could have facilitated better my induction into their in-group. Fortunately for me, there were members within that team who were high relationally oriented individuals (Vos & van der Zee, 2011), and so were more willing to cooperate and collaborate and convince others to do the same. Fortunately for them, my patience and empathy levels are high and I like to kill people with kindness, so I was committed to getting to the root of the interpersonal issue so that we could focus on getting the work done efficiently and effectively.

This team ended up being one of the best I have been a member of and my friendships with all of them continues today.

Vos, M., & van der Zee, K., (2011). Prosocial behavior in diverse workgroups: How relational identity orientation shapes cooperation and helping. Group Processes Intergroup Relations, 14(3), 363-379. doi: 10.1177/1368430210382427

2.All three key areas have been a discussion in my organization. Onboarding has a huge impact on recruiting, hiring, and retaining the best and brightest people. Identifying and implement processes that accomplish this task is instrumental to achieving this goal. As far as diversity, it’s no secret that diversity is critical to an organization. Every organization should strive to create a diverse, inclusive workplace where difference are valued and all employees are engaged and motivated. My organization has made it their priority to create a workforce with a broad range of ethnic and cultural background, expertise, educational and life experiences. This broad range ensures diversity of thoughts are heard and perspectives and differences are valued. My organization has a zero tolerance for harassment. Our policy primary focus is to ensure all incidents are reported, investigated, and resolved quickly. We hold everyone accountable for adhering to the policy. These training are not only required to stay compliant, but can adversely effect the workplace if not addressed in a timely manner. If an organization does not create a successful onboarding process, a diverse and inclusive workplace, and a harassed free environment, they can spent a lot of money and resource when disgruntle employees decide to leave the organization.

Annotated Bibliography: Students will research topic and complete an annotated bibliography for final paper. You are expected to submit at least five sources for annotated bibliography. Due Date: 4/2/ 2017 on D2L.

Preliminary Reference Page – Your reference page should include at least five sources that you intend to use in your paper, and be formatted to proper APA style. Due Date: Sunday 4/2/ 2017 on D2L.

Preliminary Outline: Students will form a preliminary outline for research paper. The outline must include the main points students plan to address in final paper. It must include at least two of your sources. The sources should be listed on a reference page as well. Sunday 4/9/2017 D2L.

The final paper will be myopportunity to present a plan and objectives for providing logistic support to a fictional disaster situation. Although every situation encountered has its own unique requirements in order to successfully support the operation, there are basic actions taken pre-, intra- and post that should be followed. Incorporate what you have learned in policy, practice and possibly personal experience and develop an operational (tactical) plan- focused on logistics support- to ensure that disaster operations go smoothly. The goal of your paper should not to create the “perfect solution”; more it should be an examination/analysis of the situation at hand, and your role as a disaster logistician to assist the Incident Commander in supporting emergency operations.

The topic (case) is

Severe storms have ravaged your rural community of 10,000. Fortunately, there are few deaths but many are displaced. Being rural, access to the community is limited and made worse by the storms. Discuss your immediate actions post-incident, and present a plan for short term sustainment of operations and support to population. If a logistics pre-plan would be beneficial, include that in your discussion.

• This case is going to be managed as a logistic chief (manager)

To answer this please carefully read all of the following:

1- Read these courses

https://emilms.fema.gov/IS0230d/index.htm

https://emilms.fema.gov/IS27/index.htm

https://emilms.fema.gov/is75/index.htm

2- Read the articles I attached below.

***** Important notes:

1- The paper must utilize APA format

2- The paper must be around 3000 words

3- do not define logistics or disasters or any other things, just directly answer the questions and manage this case according to the courses and articles I attached.

4- Beforeyou begin doing this paper you should carefully and fully understand the attachedcourses and articles.

5- include the references at the end using APA style.