The Modern Prometheus Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay Humanities Assignment Help -

The Modern Prometheus Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay Humanities Assignment Help. The Modern Prometheus Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay Humanities Assignment Help.

(/0x4*br />

Assignment Instructions: Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay

Note: Please review the source guidelines below very carefully. If you do not choose from the provided sources below, this will cause a grading delay and you will need to resubmit the assignment.

For this assignment, you will write your evaluation essay. You are required to submit only your final draft for this assignment (though we encourage all students to take advantage of the additional feedback a draft can provide). Use the grader’s feedback and the rubric to make revisions to your draft before submitting the final. Your second draft will be graded.

Now that you have completed Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, you are in a good position to consider what critics have written about the novel. You will need a total of two critiques (also known as critical analysis essays) for this assignment.

First, use the selection of links below to locate a critical analysis essay written about the 1818 version of Mary Shelley’s novel. You may focus most of your attention on this first critique. If the author of your critique is not specified, focus on the publication of the critique.

Choose from among these sources:

Romantic Circle’s Critiques:
Professor Naomi Hetherington’s critique

The questions in the study guides should have helped you evaluate this criticism in your head. Now it’s time to write it down!

Your evaluation may go more smoothly if you approach the guiding questions in this order:

Evaluate the critic/author:

Who wrote the criticism you read? What credentials does the author have? (If you are using a valid source, you should be able to find these easily)

Find the thesis of the article:

What is the thesis of the critical article you’ve chosen? What point does the author want to make about Frankenstein?

Evaluate the thesis:

Do you agree with this thesis? Why or why not? We’ve covered many ideas in the study guides. Can you find points within the guides that support your agreement or disagreement with the critical writer(s)? Look for new supporting information rather than revisiting the same ones the critics have chosen.

Evaluate the support:

Whether you agree or disagree with the thesis, does the critic provide sufficient research from the text and outside references to make a strong case? What does the article have for support from the text or outside sources? In your opinion, what makes these references valid? Do you feel the author uses this support properly?

Next, locate a second critique about the novel that includes ideas somewhat similar (genre classification, for instance) to any of the discussions you have in your essay. The second critique can either support or refute any of the claims in your paper. The objective of this portion of the essay is to further support your opinion of the primary critic’s thesis or support. Therefore, for example, if you choose a secondary article that refutes any of your claims, you will need to counteract those ideas to bring the focus of your essay back in alignment with your essay’s thesis (your personal opinion of how the primary critic is either correct or incorrect in his or her thesis claim and/or how the first critic is either effective or ineffective in his or her support). Every discussion in this essay should ultimately support the claim you make in your thesis.

For instance, if the first critic argues that Shelley’s writing is juvenile, and if you agree, does the second critic also support this thesis? How so? If the second critic does not support your assessment of the first critic’s thesis, what evidence can you use from the text to argue that the second critic is incorrect? Consider another example: if the first critic believes the novel is autobiographical, and if you disagree, does the second critic help you argue your own view of the first critic’s thesis? If so, how? Perhaps the second critic disagrees with your view and feels the novel is autobiographical– if that’s the case, be prepared to use evidence from the text to refute the second critic’s thesis and support your own argument. Using two critiques in this way will allow you to create a polished, comprehensive Evaluation Essay that allows you to connect your own ideas to those of seasoned critics.

In addition to addressing each of the evaluative components above, develop your essay so it has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. You must include an evaluative thesis statement in both the introduction and the conclusion. Ensure that each of your claims is supported with valid evidence from the literary criticism you have chosen; the novel, Frankenstein; and/or the study guides.

Using proper MLA style, insert parenthetical citations for all borrowed information in addition to a Works Cited page for Frankenstein and your chosen literary critiques; you are not required to cite the study guides if you use them.

Helpful Hints: For a thesis statement, try answering a question like: How and how well does this piece of criticism state and support its argument regarding Frankenstein?

You might use these as possible guidelines in crafting your thesis statement:
(Critic, aka author of the critique) uses (add critic title) to (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) by (explain why and/or include your support).
OR
(Critic)’s (add critique title) (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) because (explain why and/or include your support).

More specific thesis examples:

John Smith uses “Frankenstein Critique Essay” to adequately argue that Victor’s mother created the first monster by coddling Victor as a boy.
OR
John Smith’s “Frankenstein Critique Essay” does not effectively argue that Victor’s mother created the first monster because the novel Frankenstein too strongly supports inherent good or bad, which means nurturing roles cannot be held responsible.

The guidelines for this assignment are:

Length: This assignment should be a minimum of 3 typed pages or at least 750 words.

Header: Include a header in the upper left-hand corner of your writing assignment with the following information:

Your first and last name
Course Title (Composition II)
Assignment name (Evaluation Essay, Writing Assignment 4)
Current Date

Format:

MLA-style source documentation and Works Cited
Your last name and page number in the upper-right corner of each page
Double-spacing throughout
Standard font (TimesNewRoman, Calibri)
Title, centered after heading
1” margins on all sides
Save the file using one of the following extensions: .docx, .doc, .rtf, or .txt

Underline your thesis statement in the introductory paragraph.

Reminder: You need at least two critiques in addition to the novel in Works Cited in order to receive the highest score. In other words, you need three sources total in cited in the essay and on the Works Cited page in order to earn the maximum points in the corresponding column on the grading rubric. Failure to meet the source minimum will result in a severe decrease in your grade.

The Modern Prometheus Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]

MGT 403 SEU Week 10 Knowledge Management Cycle Process Discussions Business Finance Assignment Help

Assignment Title: Knowledge management cycle process in organizations and significance communities of practice

Note: Each question/concept/ topic must be supported with peer reviewed journalreferences.

Assignment Structure:

Part A.

Provide brief description about knowledge management processes in organizations. (1 Mark)
Explain the concept of organizational learning and describe the link between individual and organizational leaning. (2 Marks)
Describe role of organizational culture in knowledge management. (2 Marks)

Part B.

Describe the concept of community. Describe its key components. (1 Mark)
Discuss how communities can be linked to organizational memory in order to foster organizational learning and innovation. (2 Marks)
Highlight some of the key steps you would need to carry out in order to conduct social network analysis of an organization.What sort of questions could the social network analysis answer? (2 Marks)

[supanova_question]

University of the Cumberlands Data Mining Questions Discussion Computer Science Assignment Help

Answer the following questions. Please ensure to use the Author, YYYY APA citations with any content brought into the assignment.

For sparse data, discuss why considering only the presence of non-zero values might give a more accurate view of the objects than considering the actual magnitudes of values. When would such an approach not be desirable?

Describe the change in the time complexity of K-means as the number of clusters to be found increases.

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of treating clustering as an optimization problem. Among other factors, consider efficiency, non-determinism, and whether an optimization-based approach captures all types of clusterings that are of interest.

What is the time and space complexity of fuzzy c-means? Of SOM? How do these complexities compare to those of K-means?

Explain the difference between likelihood and probability.

Give an example of a set of clusters in which merging based on the closeness of clusters leads to a more natural set of clusters than merging based on the strength of connection (interconnectedness) of clusters.

[supanova_question]

Grantham Research Based Instructional Strategies for Lesson Plan Essay Humanities Assignment Help

PART A

Reading/Literacy specialists need to be able to plan, design, implement, and evaluate cross-curricular instruction to meet the content-specific literacy needs of secondary students. The instructional strategies for developing reading and writing across content areas must be responsive to the diversity of students.

There are many research-based instructional strategies that support reading and writing in the content areas. Based on your discussion with your mentor teacher in Topic 2, use the identified standard and skill and plan a cross-curricular lesson that supports reading and writing for the students in your field experience classroom. This is the lesson you identified with your mentor teacher in Topic 2 and will teach in Topic 4 to a small group or whole class.

Include the following:

A summary of the lesson, identifying the central focus.
Specific learning objectives aligned to state or national standards from another content area, other than English.
Multiple Means of Representation: Appropriate instructional strategies to differentiate instruction for diverse students across the content area.
Multiple Means of Engagement: How the relationship between reading, writing, and language in the development of literacy skills is addressed and how the lesson encourages students to understand, question, and analyze standards-based content.
Multiple Means of Expression: A developmentally appropriate assessment that aligns to the content area standards and measures the learning objectives.

Write a 250-500 word reflection on your experience explaining why you chose these instructional strategies and how you modified them to meet the needs of students or the content area. Explain how they are effective practices that support student learning and growth in reading and writing at all skill levels in the chosen content area. Describe how the chosen materials address cultural responsiveness and positively affect students’ knowledge, beliefs, and engagements with diversity.

Include 2-3 scholarly resources to support your instructional strategies as effective practices.

PART B

This is the amended Clinical Experience B.

Reading/Literacy specialists need to be able to evaluate instructional strategies to meet the content-specific literacy needs of secondary students. Student learning in reading and writing across content areas should include instructional practices that are responsive to the diversity of their students.

Allocate at least 3 hours in the field to support this field experience.

View a video from two different content areas concerning lesson unit plans. Please include the video links. Review any instructional approaches and instructional materials in the plans you believe develop each of the following:

Reading comprehension
Vocabulary
Writing
Critical thinking

Reflect on how and why teachers took these approaches and why certain materials were selected. Do you think there are any challenges the teachers faced when developing their lesson plans to include these areas of literacy.

Write a 250-500 word reflection based on your review of instructional approaches in the lesson plan.

Include the following:

Summarize the instructional strategies and materials used to develop student literacy.
Describe the challenges the teachers may face or possible challenges you see in the unit plan.
Explain any cultural responsiveness and engage in instructional practices that positively affect students’ knowledge, beliefs, and engagement with the features of diversity.
Describe how you will incorporate the experience gained from this field experience into your future professional practice.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

[supanova_question]

University of Maryland Baltimore Health Care Policies & Importance of Agenda Setting Discussion Health Medical Assignment Help

Regardless of political affiliation, every citizen has a stake in healthcare policy decisions. Hence, it is little wonder why healthcare items become such high-profile components of presidential agendas. It is also little wonder why they become such hotly debated agenda items.

Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each of the presidents (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?

To Prepare:

Review the Resources and reflect on the importance of agenda setting.
Consider how federal agendas promote healthcare issues and how these healthcare issues become agenda priorities.

[supanova_question]

UOTC Delivering Business Value with IT at Hefty Hardware Case Study Business Finance Assignment Help

in all your assignment submissions in this class. I know that APA and writing compliance is challenging. Please use this checklist to ensure you comply with APA standards. I will mark but not explain APA and writing errors in your papers. You will need to refer to this document to identify the correction to the marked items.

Abstract

Abstract #1: An abstract is included for any assignment where the body of the paper is over two pages.

Abstract #2: The word Abstract is used as the level one heading.

Abstract #3: The abstract is on a page by itself right after the cover page.

Abstract #4: The abstract provides a sufficient overview of the paper in one paragraph of

250 words or fewer.

Citations

Citations #1: All ideas, concepts, and information gleaned from a source include a proper citation of that source.

Citations #3: All sacred text quotations include book, chapter, verse, and version citation. Citations #4: Quotation marks are only used for quotations. Emphasis is shown by using italics.

Figures

Figures #1: All charts, graphs, plots, and screenshots are labeled as figures.

Figures #3: All figures are full width, stretching from the left margin to the right margin, and the content is readable.

Figures #5: All figures taken from a source include a full citation with the author, year, and

page number at the end of the figure label.

Headings

Headings #1: Headings are used as signposts that keep the writer focused and guide the reader.

Headings #2: The content under every heading is at least one-half page.

Headings #3: All level one headings are the same font-size as the text, centered, bold, the first letter of each word is capitalized, and the headings appear on a line by themselves. Headings #4: All level two headings are the same font-size as the text, left-justified, bold, the first letter of each word is capitalized, and the headings appear on a line by themselves.

Citations #2: All quotations include author, date, and page number(s) citation. If a page number is not available because of the format of the source, the citation includes a section name and/or a paragraph number.

Figures #2: All programming code and mathematical equations use single spacing and are placed in a box and labeled as figures and placed either in the body of the paper or in appendices. All programming code longer than one page is placed in an appendix.

Figures #4: Labels for all figures are below the figure, left-justified, and are formatted correctly as shown on the next line. The X represents the figure number.

Figure X. Descriptive title.

Headings #5: All level three headings are the same font-size as the text, left-justified, bold, only the first letter is capitalized, and each heading is the first sentence of a paragraph with a period at the end of the heading.

Eric M. Straw, PhD 2019.12.14 Page 1

Dr. Straw’s APA & Writing Checklist

Running Head

Running Head #1: The title of the paper is used as the running head.

Running Head #2: The words running head are not included in the running head except on the cover page.

Running Head #3: The running head appears left-justified, in all capital letters, and is in the header of each page.

Tables

Tables #1: All content that consists of rows and columns of numbers and/or text is labeled as a table.

Tables #2: All tables are full width, stretching from the left margin to the right margin, and the content is readable.

Tables #4: All tables taken from a source include a full citation with the author, year, and

page number below the table as a note.

Reference Page

Reference Page #1: The word References is used as the level one heading.

Reference Page #1: The references begin on a new page after the body of the paper and before the appendices.

Reference Page #3: References are sorted alphabetically by the authors’ last names. Reference Page #4: References include all sources cited in the body of the paper and only those sources cited in the body of the paper.

Reference Page #5: Each reference uses a hanging indent where the first line is left justified, and subsequent lines are indented five spaces.

Reference Page #6: Each reference is single-spaced, and there is a blank line between each reference.

Writing – general

Writing #1: 12-point Times New Roman is the font used.

Writing #2: The line spacing is double-spaced, and there are no extra blank lines between paragraphs.

Writing #3: All paragraphs are indented five spaces.

Writing #5: All acronyms are spelled out the first time they are used. Writing #6: No contractions are used.

1 American Psychological Association (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.).

Tables #3: Labels for all tables are above the table, left-justified, and and are formatted correctly as shown on the next two lines. The X reprents the table number.

Table X

Descriptive Title.

Writing #4: All proper nouns begin with a capital letter, including all names of sacred scriptures, places, people, companies, and products. If a company or product is branded with a lower-case first letter, then the branding capitalization is

UOTC Delivering Business Value with IT at Hefty Hardware Case Study Business Finance Assignment Help[supanova_question]

CRJ 306 Arizona State University Deadly Police Shooting Research Paper Writing Assignment Help

For your first research paper, choose a recent (((deadly police shooting))) that created racial controversy. Explain the facts of the case, the outcome and the issues that surrounded the case that contributed to the controversy. Rely on all readings, websites and lecture notes to apply theoretical contributing factors as to why such incidents take place.

Select ONE theory that could be used to explain the behavior. Do not try applying more than one theory for a short paper.
Briefly summarize the theory – show me that you understand the theory you are attempting to apply.
Provide at least 2 examples of how the theory applies to the case you selected. This should be presented as a separate paragraph for each distinct element of the theory you are applying.
Keep in mind that this is not an opinion based assignment, however, a researched based essay.
The essay must be APA format, at least 5 pages in length in actual content, double-spaced, using 12-point font with 1-inch margins and include at least 5 legitimate sources. Keep in mind that this is not an opinion based assignment, however, a researched based essay. You can use the ASU Library Database system to search articles/newspaper articles. Wikipedia, blogs, websites, and other nefarious sources of dubious credibility are not acceptable sources.

Rubric

Research Papers

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent (20%)

10.0 to >5.0 pts

Proficient

All required elements, stemming from the thesis, are addressed in sufficient detail; paper does not go into unrelated discussion; meets the minimum length requirements.

5.0 to >0.0 pts

Competent

Required elements are addressed, some not as in depth as the topic requires; essay may stray into irrelevant discussion; meets or comes close to meeting minimum length requirements.

0.0 pts

Novice

Required elements are addressed or not addressed in sufficient depth; essay wanders off-topic; does not meet minimum length requirements.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting (20%)

10.0 to >5.0 pts

Proficient

Clear, concise writing; required elements are clearly identified and well-supported; minimal grammatical errors. Clearly organized paper that is arranged in a logical order; clear introduction, body, and conclusion; proper use of paragraphs.

5.0 to >0.0 pts

Competent

Overall good writing but may have some inconsistencies; minimal unclear passages; some grammatical or spelling errors. Well-organized paper overall; missing a solid introduction or conclusion; some use of huge mega-paragraphs.

0.0 pts

Novice

Poor writing; unclear passages; numerous spelling or grammatical errors. Disorganized paper; no logical order to the structure; missing introduction or conclusion; extensive use of huge mega-paragraphs.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat (20%)

10.0 to >5.0 pts

Proficient

Consistent, proper citation of outside sources within the paper and in the bibliography following the paper; essay has a cover page and separate page for bibliography.

5.0 to >0.0 pts

Competent

Proper citation of outside sources within the paper and in the bibliography; no cover page or bibliography is listed on the same page as the essay.

0.0 pts

Novice

Sources cited improperly or not at all; missing bibliography; no cover page; most of the first page of content is used for non-content material.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources (20%)

10.0 to >5.0 pts

Proficient

Student uses 5 sources; published within last 10 years; fact-based/ academic in nature.

5.0 to >0.0 pts

Competent

Student uses less than 3 outside sources if required; may use course text as a source; may have used old sources (over 10 years old); some unacceptable sources (Wiki, blogs, etc.)

0.0 pts

Novice

Student does not meet minimum source requirements; extensive use of course text; has used old sources; extensive use of unacceptable sources.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuotations (20%)

10.0 to >5.0 pts

Proficient

Used sparingly if at all; paper is well paraphrased, excellent summary of source material.

5.0 to >0.0 pts

Competent

Some over-use or overly-long quotations that do not add to the overall quality of the paper.

0.0 pts

Novice

Used extensively; does not demonstrate that the student understands the material.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 50.0

[supanova_question]

Grantham University Media Complexity Theory Presentation Business Finance Assignment Help

This week you are tasked with presenting a communication theory to the class.You must present your presentation on Media Multiplexity Theory.

In a 5 to 10 minute PowerPoint presentation you will need to record yourself presenting your theory of choice (may be video or audio) as well as creating slides with visuals and brief wording (no paragraphs on slides). In the ‘NOTES’ area of PowerPoint (at the bottom near display settings) put what you’ll be saying in the presentation (such as main points that support the content on the slides). Don’t worry about the audio, Ill add that to the presentation.

Your PowerPoint must consist of:

Title Slide – Share what theory you are presenting, course name, Instructor Name, Date

Theory Description – In your own words how would you describe this theory? Is the theory interpretative or objective? Help us understand this theory (use examples).

Theory History – When was this theory created and why? Who helped create this theory? Does it relate to other communication theories? What are the common threads of this theory in connection with society?

Examples – Give examples of how this theory can be used or interpreted. For instance, how would you study this theory to see if it runs true in real/present life? Share how you could study this theory.

Compare – What are the strengths and limitations of this theory? Give examples of this to help us all gain a deeper understanding and show your knowledge

Criticize – Debate this theory. Do you find it useful? Do you find it outdated or in conflict with other theories? Can other theories relate to this theory (or be put in the same category)? Was the theory difficult to understand or apply?

Reference Slide- Share any sources you may have used here in APA formatting

[supanova_question]

UCLA Google LLC Corporate Social Responsibility Paper Writing Assignment Help

Pick ONE of the following topics:

– Research and profile a company that currently exhibits Strategic CSR. Offer specific examples of this, use references, internal company sources.

– Research and profile a company that does not exhibit Strategic CSR. Offer specific examples of this, use references, internal company sources.

•For either topic, your conclusions should include recommendations moving forward if you were the CEO!

•2 pages, single spaced

•Cover page

•Bibliography ( quality references outside of in class materials)

•Will be graded for (clarity, grammar and –Compelling introduction–Body with sound arguments/references–Logical paragraph structure–Conclusion that summarizes key points, make a clear recommendation as CEO)

(Will definitely tip if write well?

[supanova_question]

MITS 5505 Victorian Institute of Technology Knowledge Management Paper & Presentation Writing Assignment Help

http://www.aserenko.com/papers/Serenko_Bontis_2013…

These instructions apply to both the Presentation and Research Report assessments only. The
paper you select must be directly relevant to Knowledge Management, Knowledge Transfer,
Knowledge Modelling or Knowledge Engineering topics. The paper can be from any academic
conference or other relevant Journal or online sources such as Google Scholar, Academic
department repositories etc. All students must select a different paper, thus the paper must be
approved by your lecturer or tutor before proceeding. In case two students are wanting to
present on the same paper, the first who emails the lecturer or tutor with their choice will be
allocated that paper.
Presentation and Participation – 5% (weeks 9-12)
For this component you will be required to do a 5-10 minutes presentation on an academic paper
based on Knowledge Management, Knowledge Transfer, Knowledge Modelling or Knowledge
Engineering

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/