Troy University Discussion Core Ethical Principles Reflective Discussion Humanities Assignment Help

Troy University Discussion Core Ethical Principles Reflective Discussion Humanities Assignment Help. Troy University Discussion Core Ethical Principles Reflective Discussion Humanities Assignment Help.


(/0x4*br />

NOTE: Please be mindful of grammar and the overall organization of your posts. Your statements should be clear and concise.

1.Briefly discuss what has impacted the development of your worldview and value system. Further, talk a little about how this may impact the work that you will do with clients/consumers……… earlier in my life, my kids was involved in a car accident with their father. My oldest son a sustained a head injury with other health issues and my baby pass away at the scene of the accident. The person who cause the accident was high on drugs. through this life altering situation I became a helper and want to be help to others thru counseling.

2. Considering the core ethical principles (beneficence, autonomy, justice and etc.), briefly discuss one (1) of the principles that may be challenging for you to adhere to when assisting clients or working with your colleagues. Please explain why.…….. I choose nonmaleficence.

Troy University Discussion Core Ethical Principles Reflective Discussion Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]

Singapore University of Social Sciences Junior Human Resource Executive Case Study Writing Assignment Help

Assignments requirements

Please follow the submission instructions stated below:

There is 2 parts to the assignment

  • 800 words critique essay
  • You have been tasked to design a telephone interview to help filter suitable candidates for the position of a Junior Human Resource Executive.

Question 1

“In the last few years, there is an increasing trend for recruiters to make use of AI powered software for the initial screening of resumes to boost recruiting endeavours. It is often thought that AI software is free of biases while its objectivity in assessment is pure”. Develop a critical argument, with illustrations, in favour of using AI software in the initial screening of resumes to advance short-listed candidates for the recruitment. Make assumptions about using AI software and people with regard to their advantages and disadvantages in this screening process. (Maximum Word Limit: 800 words)

Question 2

Imagine that you are a Talent Acquisition Specialist in a Multi-National Company. You have been tasked to design a telephone interview to help filter suitable candidates for the position of a Junior Human Resource Executive. Your company is interested to hire fresh graduates who are up-to-date with HR trends, possess insightful HR perspectives; and drive to engage people.

  • Task
    • Develop an interview plan and guide based on the job requirements.

Identify the KSAOs to be assessed through the telephone interview. Formulate a plan that details how the interview should be conducted, the design of the interview and use of results in decisions. Develop an interview guide with questions and scoring rubrics. You may use the “Interview Questions Template” to help you design your interview questions.

Task component should include the following

Identify the KSAOs to be assessed through the telephone interview. Formulate a plan that details how the interview should be conducted, the design of the interview and use of results in decisions. Develop an interview guide with questions and scoring rubrics. You may use the “Interview Questions Template” to help you design your interview questions.

[supanova_question]

NCTC Business Strategy and Organizational Performance Discussion Computer Science Assignment Help

Why is it important for business strategy to drive organizational strategy and IS strategy? What might happen if the business strategy was not the driver?

Please make your initial post and two response posts substantive. A substantive post will do at least two of the following:

  • Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic
  • Answer a question (in detail) posted by another student or the instructor
  • Provide extensive additional information on the topic
  • Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail
  • Share an applicable personal experience
  • Provide an outside source (for example, an article from the UC Library) that applies to the topic, along with additional information about the topic or the source (please cite properly in APA)
  • Make an argument concerning the topic.

At least one scholarly source should be used in the initial discussion thread. Be sure to use information from your readings and other sources from the UC Library. Use proper citations and references in your post.

Need 450 to 500 not including the references words 3 paragraphs one page.

[supanova_question]

HMD 402 Cal Poly Pomona Law Assignment of Judicial Precedent Questions Law Assignment Help

You must do your own work and use Turnitin. I will not accept any paper that has any cut and paste material.

Like all papers you’ll submit, formatting is: 1” margins all around, double spaced, Times New Roman 12-point font.

There is a 5page minimum…At least one page per question. The more work you do the better score you will receive.

Question 1:

The terms “precedent” and “stare decisis” are used to describe how a judge’s interpretation of a law can become law itself. Do your own independent research into what “precedent” and “stare decisis” means and using your own words, you define those terms.

Question 2:

“Statutory” law comes from federal and state legislative bodies. Those men and women we elect to represent us make law concerning a variety of things, like family law, contract law, employment law, traffic law, etc. Do your own independent research into how the legislative process works. For example, years ago Nevada did not have a seatbelt law. A member of the Nevada Legislature had an “idea” that a seatbelt law would help save lives. That “idea” eventually became a “law.” What process occurred?

Question 3:

“Common” law can come from judges interpreting other sources of law. Technically, not all judges make common law. There are generally two kinds of judges: 1) single trial judges overseeing trial courtrooms, and, 2) groups of appellate judges overseeing appellate courtrooms. Common law comes primarily from “appellate” judges. Do your own independent research into how federal and state courts systems are typically set up. Then, describe in your own words what an “appellate” court is, how many judges typically sit on an appellate court, what an appellate court’s primary responsibility is, and why it is so important that we have appellate courts in our legal system.

[supanova_question]

Grand Canyon University Social Media in Nursing Discussion Health Medical Assignment Help

Social media plays a significant role in the lives of nurses in both their professional and personal lives. Additionally, social media is now considered a mainstream part of the process for recruiting and hiring candidates. Inappropriate or unethical conduct on social media can create legal problems for nurses as well as the field of nursing.

Login to all social media sites in which you engage. Review your profile, pictures and posts. Based on the professional standards of nursing, identify items that would be considered unprofessional and potentially detrimental to your career and that negatively impact the reputation of the nursing field.

In 500-750 words, summarize the findings of your review. Include the following:

  1. Describe the posts or conversations in which you have engaged that might be considered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing.
  2. Discuss why nurses have a responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with the standards governing the profession of nursing at work and in their personal lives. Include discussion of how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional. Provide an example of each to support your answer.
  3. Based on the analysis of your social media, discuss what areas of your social media activity reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity for all individuals. Describe areas of your social media activity that could be improved.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

[supanova_question]

[supanova_question]

Miami University Leadership Autobiography Past Present And Future Reflection Writing Assignment Help

Reflection Assignment #1- Leadership Autobiography – Past, Present & Future

Compose a concise (3-4 pages, double spaced), well-organized autobiography that reflects on your definition of leadership and how you have been impacted by both present and past leaders in your life. This is an analytical and reflective review of the influencers (people and experiences) that have shaped who you are as a person and leader. Below are some helpful questions you want to be sure you cover.

Who/What has got me here? (The Past)

  • Who are the people that have had a significant impact on you and WHY?
  • What leadership skills do you possess?
  • What skills have you developed and how? What are your growth areas.

Who are the people now impacting me ? (Present)

  • The people you spend time with. Given a choice, whom do you most enjoy talking to?
  • Whose opinion do you listen to the most?
  • What kinds of people are you drawn to? Why?
  • How have these people influenced your choices or behaviors?
  • Have any of these people helped you to be more authentic, more autonomous, or adapt to challenges and changes?

Who/What do I need to be great in the future?

  • Going forward who should you include on a personal board of directors. (See link below)

Note: Read the article then think about the types of people you may want to include in your inner circle (i.e. your own personal board. note: this board is not inclusive just representative of types of people you may choose to fulfill different roles). Feel free to include others who you think would be valuable to moving you forward.

https://theglasshammer.com/2011/07/five-people-you-need-on-your-personal-board-of-directors/

Miami University Leadership Autobiography Past Present And Future Reflection Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]

ENG 101 Strayer University Understanding Genetically Modified Organisms Research Paper Writing Assignment Help

PLEASE NO PLAGIARISM

Touchstone 1.2: Write a Research Question, Thesis, and Outline

ASSIGNMENT: Following the Topic Selection Guidelines below, choose an argumentative topic to research. This will be your topic throughout the entire course, so the activities required for this assignment will provide the foundation for your future Touchstones. The topic for an argumentative research paper must be a debatable topic, meaning that it involves conflicting viewpoints. Additionally, it cannot be a topic that is already decided or agreed upon by most of society. You will need to take a firm position on the topic and use evidence and logic to support the position. Touchstone 1.2 includes a research question, a working thesis, a detailed outline, and a reflection on this pre-writing process.

Sample Touchstone 1.2


A. Topic Selection Guidelines

DIRECTIONS: You may choose any topic you wish as long as the topic has two clear sides and is not agreed upon by most of society. Your topic should be current, appropriate for an academic context and should have a focus suitable for a 6-8 page essay.

In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.


B. Research Guidelines

DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

1. Research Question and Working Thesis

Keep in mind: The research question and working thesis are the driving force behind your research and eventual argument.

❒ Your research question should be a single sentence, framed as a question.
❒ Your working thesis should be a single focused sentence, framed as a statement that takes a clear position on the research question.
❒ Include your research question followed by your working thesis.

2. Detailed Outline

Keep in mind: Your detailed outline provides a map of the argumentative research essay that you will write, including your key claims and the sources that support them. You may not have all your sources yet, and that is fine. The outline is a way to organize your essay and determine which areas (e.g. your sub-points) will require researched evidence as support.

❒ Headings: one for each paragraph with a brief label of the paragraph’s controlling idea(s).
❒ An introduction, at least five body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
❒ Introduction includes your working thesis.
❒ Body paragraphs should each have their own unique title and key points.
❒ Conclusion includes notes on your final thoughts.
❒ Subheadings: two to five for each paragraph, below each heading, indicating key points that support the controlling idea
❒ Sources: one to three for each paragraph, as relevant, indicating the support for the key points
❒ For each source, include the author’s name and the idea or information relevant to your argument (e.g. “Lappé on mono-cropping corn/soy and production”).

3. Reflection

❒ Have you displayed a clear understanding of the research activities?
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?

C. Reflection Questions

DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.

  1. Learning to conduct research is important because it is a skill you will use both in academia and in your professional life. It improves critical thinking and empowers you to find information for yourself. Consider the process of researching as a whole. What was the most challenging aspect of the process for you? (2-3 sentences)
  2. The working thesis statement is a proposed answer to your research question. It should clearly identify a debatable topic and take a position on one side of that topic. Analyze the effectiveness of your working thesis statement. (3-4 sentences)
  3. A detailed outline is an effective tool for laying out the progression of an argument. It allows you to consider the arrangement and organization of your ideas, as well as choose places to incorporate outside source materials. Review your detailed outline and summarize the argument you’ve presented. (3-4 sentences)
  4. You will use the same topic on three of the remaining Touchstones in this course. What kind of feedback would be helpful for you? What are specific questions you might have as you go deeper into the research process? (2-3 sentences)

D. Rubric

Advanced (90-100%) Proficient (80-89%) Acceptable (70-79%) Needs Improvement (50-69%) Non-Performance (0-49%)

Research Question

Pose a meaningful research question on a debatable topic.

Constructs a precise and focused research question relative to a current and debatable topic. Constructs a focused research question relative to a debatable topic. Constructs a research question relative to a debatable topic; however it is somewhat too broad or too narrow for the assignment. Constructs a research question; however, the question is too broad or too narrow for the assignment and/or it is not debatable. Does not construct a research question, or constructs a research question that does not meet any of the rubric criteria.

Working Thesis

Propose a focused working thesis.

Includes a working thesis that takes a well-articulated, clear, specific position on one side of an issue. Includes a working thesis that takes a clear, specific position on one side of an issue. Includes a working thesis that takes a clear position on one side of an issue; however it lacks specificity. Includes a working thesis; however, it lacks specificity and does not take a clear position. Does not include a working thesis, or includes a thesis that does not take a position.

Detailed Outline

Present a detailed outline that includes coherent headings, subheadings, and source placement notes.

Outline is thoroughly developed and clearly labeled with effective notes, such that the reader can easily see how the essay will build its argument; all necessary elements of the outline are present. Outline is well-developed and labeled with sufficient notes, such that the reader can get a sense of how the essay will build its argument; all necessary elements of the outline are present. Outline is primarily well-developed and labeled with sufficient notes, such that the reader can get an overall sense of how the essay will build its argument; however, a few necessary elements may be unclear or missing. Outline is not fully developed and/or labeling and notes are often unclear, such that the reader cannot easily get a sense of how the essay will build its argument; several necessary elements of the outline are unclear or missing. Outline is not developed and/or labeling and notes are unclear or absent, such that the reader is unable to see how the essay will build its argument; most necessary elements of the outline are unclear or missing.

Style

Establish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices.

Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures. Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures. Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures. Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures. Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.

Conventions

Follow conventions for standard written English.

There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage. There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage. There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage. There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage. There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage.

Reflection

Answer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully.

Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses, following or exceeding response length guidelines. Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple insights, observations, and/or examples, following response length guidelines. Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines. Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines. No reflection responses are present.

E. Requirements

The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:

  • Double-space the outline and use one-inch margins.
  • Use a readable 12-point font.
  • All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
  • Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
  • Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
  • Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.
  • Submission must include your research question, working thesis, outline, and reflection questions.
  • Include all of the assignment components in a single file.
    • Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.

F. Additional Resources

The following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment:

  1. Purdue Online Writing Lab’s APA Formatting and Style Guide
    1. This site includes a comprehensive overview of APA style, as well as individual pages with guidelines for specific citation types.
  2. Frequently Asked Questions About APA Style
    1. This page on the official APA website addresses common questions related to APA formatting. The “References,” “Punctuation,” and “Grammar and Writing Style” sections will be the most useful to your work in this course.
  3. APA Style: Quick Answers—References
    1. This page on the official APA Style website provides numerous examples of reference list formatting for various source types.

[supanova_question]

ENG 101 Strayer University Touchstone on A recess to Children Summary Writing Assignment Help

PLEASE NO PLAGIARISM


Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you can’t submit it until you have completed the unit’s Challenges. Once you’ve submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score.

Touchstone 1.1: Engage with a Work of Research

ASSIGNMENT: For this essay, you will select one of the articles provided below and engage in a 2-3 page summary and response dialogue with the source. This will involve providing a detailed summary of the source’s argument and responding to that argument with your position based on the information provided in the source.

In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.

Article Option 1: “The Recess Debate: A Disjuncture between Educational Policy and Scientific Research”
Article Option 2: “Sugar in School Breakfasts: A School District’s Perspective”

Sample Touchstone


A. Assignment Guidelines

DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

1. Article Summary

❒ Have you communicated the source’s purpose?
❒ Have you included all of the source’s main points?
❒ Have you restated the source’s argument in your own words?

2. Article Response

❒ Have you provided your perspective on the source’s argument?
❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate why you either agree or disagree with the argument?

3. Reflection

❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?

B. Reflection Questions

DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.

  1. What ideas originally came to mind when you first read through the article? Did your initial response to the article change after reading it for a second time? (3-4 sentences)
  2. How does paying attention to the way you respond to a source help you formulate your stance on a topic? (2-3 sentences)

C. Rubric

Advanced (90-100%) Proficient (80-89%) Acceptable (70-79%) Needs Improvement (50-69%) Non-Performance (0-49%)

Source Summary

Summarize the main argument of a research source.

Provides a complete and accurate summary of the article’s main purpose and argument in the writer’s own words. Provides an accurate summary of the article’s main purpose and argument in the writer’s own words. Provides an accurate summary, but relies too heavily on source quotations. Provides an incomplete summary of the article’s main purpose and argument and/or relies too heavily on source quotations. Does not provide a complete and accurate summary of the article’s main purpose and argument in the writer’s own words.

Source Response

Articulate a response to the argument presented in a research source.

Constructs a thoughtful and academically appropriate response to the source, including samples from the source that relate to the response. Constructs an academically appropriate response to the source, including samples from the source that relate to the response. Constructs an academically appropriate response to the source, but could include more samples from the source that relate to the response. Constructs a response to the source, but does not include samples that relate to the response. Does not construct an academically appropriate response to the source and/or does not include samples from the source that relate to the response.

Organization

Exhibit competent organizational writing techniques.

Includes all of the required components of a summary and response essay, including an introduction with an engaging summary of the source’s argument, body paragraphs containing a detailed and thoughtful response to the argument, and a conclusion with a concluding statement. Includes all of the required components of a summary and response essay, including an introduction with a summary of the source’s argument, body paragraphs containing a response to the argument, and a conclusion with a concluding statement. Includes nearly all of the required components of summary and response essay; however, one component is missing. Includes most of the required components of a summary and response essay, but is lacking two components; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are sometimes unclear and the reader may have difficulty following the progression of the essay. Lacks several or all of the components of a summary and response essay; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are often unclear and the reader has difficulty following the progression of the essay.

Style

Establish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices.

Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures. Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures. Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures. Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures. Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.

Conventions

Follow conventions for standard written English.

There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.

Reflection

Answer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully.

Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses, following or exceeding response length guidelines. Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple insights, observations, and/or examples, following response length guidelines. Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines. Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines. No reflection responses are present.

D. Requirements

The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:

  • Composition must be 2-3 pages (approximately 500-750 words).
  • Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins.
  • Use a readable 12-point font.
  • All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
  • Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
  • Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
  • Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.
  • Include all of the assignment components in a single file.
    • Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.

E. Additional Resources

The following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment:

  1. Purdue Online Writing Lab’s APA Formatting and Style Guide
    1. This site includes a comprehensive overview of APA style, as well as individual pages with guidelines for specific citation types.
  2. Frequently Asked Questions About APA Style
    1. This page on the official APA website addresses common questions related to APA formatting. The “References,” “Punctuation,” and “Grammar and Writing Style” sections will be the most useful to your work in this course.
  3. APA Style: Quick Answers—References
    1. This page on the official APA Style website provides numerous examples of reference list formatting for various source types.

[supanova_question]

HR 310 Park Understanding leadership and Business solutions in Robotics Team Case Study Business Finance Assignment Help

Introduction

A case study analysis requires that you investigate a business problem, examine the possible and/or alternative solutions, and propose the most effective solution using supporting evidence.

  • Read and examine the case carefully.
  • Focus on the issues/problems.
  • Brainstorm possible solutions or changes that need to be made.
  • Select the best solution with reasoning.

Unit Learning Outcomes

  • Analyze theories of motivation (CLO 2).
  • Differentiate leadership styles (CLO 2).
  • Assess your leadership style in various contexts (CLO 1).

Case Summary – 3.2 Leading the Robotics Team

    • Anders Dahlgren is the mentor for a high school robotics team consisting of 15 students, ranging from freshman to seniors, with 14 of the 15 students being male, and 1 student being female. Anders is responsible for assigning a mentor to the team, and overseeing the students who are divided into two groups, mechanical, the group that designs and builds the robot, and programming, the group that designs the code that tells the robot how to complete its tasks. Anders is considering three different members of the team to be the captain.The first student, Pria, is a junior, the only female on the team, and is a programmer. She is described as very serious and talented, but also organized and rigid. She sticks to a developed schedule and deadlines and is willing to offer solutions for the other programming group members when there is a problem or obstacle. A barrier she faces is that some of the group members from both the mechanical and programming team consider her to be bossy and have stressed them out with deadlines and rigidity.The next student, Justin, is a member of the mechanical group. He is sociable and likeable, and is more hands-on in his approach, and is willing to attempt to try to find a solution by doing other than scheduling or planning. Anders notes that Justin is creative as a leader, but that if parameters and goals aren’t established, the entire session can become chaotic very quickly.The final student, Jerome, has been a member of the programming team for four years, now a senior, and is quiet, respectable, and polite. He is known for being someone that listens to the input of others and considers their ideas even if he does not agree with them, as it allows for all members to be a part of the learning process. The criticism of Jerome is that his leadership style “often slows down progress” and it has, at times, caused them to scrap their project and start over. When asked by Anders why he isn’t more assertive, Jerome defends the process of learning, and not following orders from someone else.

Directions

  1. Read the full case study in the textbook: Case 3.2 – Leading the Robotics Team.
  2. Answer the case study discussion questions.
  3. Submit your work for review.

Case Study Questions

    1. How would you describe the individual leadership styles of Pria, Justin, and Jerome?
    2. Based on the assumptions of Theory X and Theory Y, how would you describe Pria, Justin, and Jerome’s philosophy of leadership?
    3. Do you think a democratic leader would be as effective as an authoritarian leader in this competitive situation? Why or why not?

Case Study Requirements

  • Full points will be earned if the case study(s):
    • responds to every aspect of the assignment
    • contains fully developed answers
    • displays a familiarity with the related materials and topics being referenced
  • Exhibit the ability to apply the related concepts to the case study.
  • Each question warrants a response that is well developed and is well-formatted.
  • At least one page in length, typed, and double spaced.
  • All cited material must include both internal citations and a complete reference list at the end of the paper.

Due Date

  • Submit by 11:59 p.m., Sunday, CT.

Rubric

Case Study Rubric

Case Study Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues or Problems

10.0 pts

Excellent

Identifies and understands the main issues in the case study.

9.0 pts

Proficient

Identifies and understands most of the main issues in the case study.

7.0 pts

Sufficient

Identifies and understands some of the main issues in the case study.

5.0 pts

Developing

Identifies and understands few of the main issues in the case study.

3.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Does not clearly identify main issues in the case study.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch and Review

10.0 pts

Excellent

Excellent research with clearly documented associations and links between problems or questions and key course concepts.

9.0 pts

Proficient

Satisfactory research with documented associations and links between problems or questions and key course concepts.

7.0 pts

Sufficient

Limited research with documented associations between problems or questions and key course concepts.

5.0 pts

Developing

Incomplete research with documented associations between problems or questions and key course concepts.

3.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Little or no research with documented associations between problems or questions and key course concepts.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis Solution Options

10.0 pts

Excellent

Insightful and thorough analysis of all the key issues. Alternative solutions/options cover all the key issues with descriptive well-reasoned and logical discussion.

9.0 pts

Proficient

Insightful and thorough analysis of most all the key issues. Alternative solutions/options cover most the key issues with well-thought out reasoning and logical discussion.

7.0 pts

Sufficient

Insightful and thorough analysis of some of the key issues. Alternative solutions/options cover some of the key issues with solid reasoning and discussion.

5.0 pts

Developing

Developing analysis of the some of the key issues. Further development is needed. Alternative solutions/options cover few of the key issues with minimal reasoning and discussion.

3.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Incomplete analysis of the key issues. Incomplete solutions/options without sound reasoning or discussion.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Organization Format

10.0 pts

Excellent

Writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. Clear, concise, and creative presentation of ideas. Organization is effective. Sources are identified and in APA format.

9.0 pts

Proficient

Writing is mostly free of grammar and spelling errors. Most ideas are clearly presented. Organization is effective. Sources are identified and in APA format.

7.0 pts

Sufficient

Writing contains several spelling or grammatical errors. Some ideas are clearly presented and organized. Sources are identified with errors in APA format.

5.0 pts

Developing

Writing contains many errors with grammatical mistakes. Ideas are difficult to follow. Sources are not identified or errors in APA format.

3.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Errors in grammar and spelling distract from the overall message. Ideas are incomplete. APA format was not used correctly.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 40.0

PreviousNext

[supanova_question]

NUR 435 Denver School of Nursing Wk 8 Professional Resume to Be Nurse Paper Health Medical Assignment Help

Due: Sunday night at 11:59pm Mountain Time

Step 1 Create or update your professional resume.

Attach an updated resume/curriculum vitae as the last section of this two-part assignment. Your contact information and work history should be up to date. There are many online resources to help you. You may find GCF Learn Free particularly useful. Your resume must include the following basic information, although you are free to present it as you see fit.

  • Contact information
  • Personal statement/Objective
  • Skills/Qualifications
  • Education
  • Experience

In addition, please include sections for the following:

  • Competency and Certification: Describe all certifications or competencies you have completed during your nursing career. You may add an actual checklist if desired. This list can include use of specialized equipment or procedures, such as conscious sedation, use of CRRT machine, ultrasound IV placement, telemetry course, BLS, ACLS, and the like.
  • Honors and Awards: Describe any awards or honors you have received during your nursing career. This could include years of service recognition awards for organizational loyalty or perfect attendance during a quarter.
  • Professional Organizations: Describe any organizations or community programs in which you are professionally involved. Also, list any offices or positions held within your organization.

Step 2 Save and submit your assignment.

When you have completed your assignment, save a copy for yourself in an easily accessible place and submit a copy to your instructor.

Cite all sources in APA format.

For grading details, see the rubric

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/

[supanova_question]

Troy University Discussion Core Ethical Principles Reflective Discussion Humanities Assignment Help

Troy University Discussion Core Ethical Principles Reflective Discussion Humanities Assignment Help

× How can I help you?