University of Southern California Politics in India Research Writing Assignment Help. University of Southern California Politics in India Research Writing Assignment Help.
(/0x4*br />
writing research using internet a bout politics in India
3 to 4 pages
The questions are about politics in India
questions.
Research the internet to answer these
1. India is described as a country which is “a Unity in Diversity”. What does it mean?
Give a detailed answer.
A related question is that it is said about India that it is only “a Geographical
Expression” and not a “Nation”. Do you agree? Give reasons.
2. The following are some characteristic features of politics in India:
a.Linguistic politics
b. Caste politics
C. Secular vs. Communal politics
Briefly explain each one and discuss how language, caste and religion play a crucial
role in politics in India.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Do the research on the internet to answer these questions. Cite your internet
sources (at least 3).
The answers must be in your OWN language
please follow the instractions
University of Southern California Politics in India Research Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]
Troy University Life in The Iron Mills Sentimentalism and Realism Questions Humanities Assignment Help
1. Choose one characteristic of sentimentalism and one of realism and discuss its role in “Life in the Iron Mills.” How does each help convey the theme of the work?
LEARNING OBJECTIVES: STRONG OPENING THESIS, DEVELOPMENT (500 words), SUPPORT (quotations), OBJECTIVE TONE (No “I” or “we”).
2. Contrast one local-color work by a woman to one by a man (either Twain or Harte). What are the gender differences between these stories? How do those differences make the function of male local color different from that of women’s local color?
LEARNING OBJECTIVES: STRONG OPENING THESIS, DEVELOPMENT (500 words), SUPPORT (quotations), OBJECTIVE TONE (No “I” or “we”).
[supanova_question]
DDBA8161 Walden University Value Creation Through Diversification Paper Business Finance Assignment Help
To prepare for this Assignment, select four peer-reviewed scholarly articles, with each article addressing a topic of interest for research. For more information, refer to the Walden Writing Center’s annotated bibliography sample document provided in this week’s Required Readings.
Submit an annotated bibliography for the four new (not used in previous discussions or assignments) peer-reviewed resources you selected. In your annotated bibliography, include the following:
- A full APA-style bibliographic reference including the author, title, publisher, and place of publication
- A summary of the document (2–3 paragraphs for each entry), including the main points, its purpose, the theoretical perspective on which it is based, and the scope
- For each article, evaluate the following:
- Reliability (research methods used, theories used, and data on which it is based)
- Appropriateness for the intended audience
- Background and authority of the author
- Limitations of the research (which can depend on the scope, reliability, age of the document, and bias)
- Significance of the research
- Note: Be sure to use the Annotated Bibliography Sample Document to complete this Assignment. Also, refer to the Week 7 Assignment Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this rubric to assess your work.
[supanova_question]
Walden University Practical Lessons of Managing Diversity Analysis Essay Business Finance Assignment Help
To prepare for this Shared Practice:
1.Consider your own background, experiences, values, goals, and attitudes
2.Talk to colleagues or friends who have different experiences so that you can compare how your different perspectives about work align.
~ Identify at least two or three who are different from you in age, gender, religion, ethnicity, education, career path, position within an organization or type of career, and so on.
Prepare a cohesive response to the following, in which you:
1. Describe what stood out—after talking with others and reviewing this week’s Learning Resources—as something you had not thought about or realized before about how differences in individuals can impact the workplace.
2. Describe your experience with diversity in the workplace.
~ What are the biggest advantages to an organization that focuses on nurturing a diverse workforce? Be specific and justify your response.
~ What do you believe are the biggest challenges or risks? Be specific and justify your response.
3. Describe how you, as a manager, might achieve diversity on your team?
4. Explain specific areas involving diversity about which you need to learn more.
~ What do you think will be your greatest challenge?
~ What skills and characteristics do you possess that you think will help you?
Be sure to support your ideas by connecting them to the week’s Learning Resources, as well as other credible resources you have read; or what you have observed and experienced.
General Guidance: Shared Practice will typically be 3-4 paragraphs in length.
References
D’Gama, L. (2016). Practical lessons of managing diversity. Human Capital, 20(1), 54–55.
Ferdman, B. M. (2017). Paradoxes of inclusion: Understanding and managing the tensions of diversity and multiculturalism. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 53(2), 235–263.
Ghosh, K. (2016). Making the environment inclusive. Human Capital, 20(1), 88–90.
Lozano, J., & Escrich, T. (2017). Cultural diversity in business: A critical reflection on the ideology of tolerance. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(4), pp. 679-696.
- TEDx Talks. (2014). Why cultural diversity matters | Michael Gavin | TEDxCSU [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48RoRi0ddRU
- TEDx Talks. (2016). Are you biased? I am | Kristen Pressner | TEDxBasel [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bq_xYSOZrgU
- Tyagi, R. (2016). Managing the struggles in diversity. Human Capital, 20(1), 59–61.
[supanova_question]
BIO201 Mod 8 CSU Global Campus Public Health and the Environment Portfolio Project Science Assignment Help
Portfolio Milestone (20 Points)
Preliminary Written Report
Review the Portfolio Project description and grading rubric in the Module 8 folder to determine which project option you are going to choose.
For this milestone, provide a brief one-paragraph response indicating:
- which assignment option from Module 8 you have chosen, and
- which public health issue you have selected and why.
This will help your instructor to be aware of your plans and support
you with the development of this project. Upload your response as a Word
document.
Review the Portfolio Project Milestone grading rubric for specific requirements and details for this assignment.
Rubric
BIO201 Mod 2 PM
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
|
|
10.0 pts
|
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
|
|
10.0 pts
|
||||
|
Total Points:
|
||||||
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
California State University Fresno Sarbanes Oxley Act Policy Discussion Writing Assignment Help
Two U.S. senators accused the Department of Labor of violating the “spirit and goals” of a federal law aimed at protecting employees who report corporate wrongdoing and called on the agency to stop rejecting claims from workers at subsidiary companies.
In a letter to Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao, Sen. Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat who is chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Sen. Charles Grassley, an Iowa Republican who also is on the committee, wrote that they were dismayed that the “administration — the Department of Labor in particular — has been using overly restrictive interpretation of this law to dismiss a majority of the complaints” filed under the whistleblower-protection provisions of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Sen. Leahy and Sen. Grassley, who wrote those provisions, said that “there is simply no basis to assert” that employees of the subsidiaries of publicly traded companies aren’t covered under the act, as the department has asserted in numerous recent cases.
The letter cited an article in The Wall Street Journal last week that reported on the department’s stance. Department records show the government has ruled in favor of corporate whistleblowers 17 times out of 1,273 complaints filed since 2002. An additional 841 cases have been dismissed, the records show, with many of the dismissals made on subsidiary-exclusion grounds. The rest of the cases are either pending, withdrawn, or were settled.
Related Reading:
In a statement, the Labor Department said it would respond fully to the concerns of the senators. But the agency said, “We are confident we are correctly enforcing the statute, and do not believe the text of Sarbanes-Oxley as written supports the broader reading that employees of subsidiaries are automatically covered.”
Tom Devine, legal director of the Government Accountability Project, a nonprofit group that promotes whistleblower rights, called the department’s stance “dysfunctional,” saying: “This one is a no-brainer. There is nothing in the law that allows for that type of loophole.”
The senators asked the department to supply documentation and a response supporting the agency’s position — and until that time, to suspend its interpretation that exempts employees of subsidiaries.
The department’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration enforces the whistleblowers’ provisions, which prohibit publicly traded companies or “any other officer, employee, contractor, subcontractor, or agent of such company” from retaliating against employees who provide information or assist in investigations related to the alleged fraud.
In their letter, the legislators wrote that the whistleblower provision was a direct response to fraud perpetrated by Enron Corp., “through the misuse and abuse of its shell corporations and subsidiaries.”
Cases dismissed on the subsidiary-exclusion rule include whistleblower complaints against the German manufacturing conglomerate Siemens AG, London media titan WPP Group PLC; ING Groep NV of the Netherlands; Alabama insurer Torchmark Corp.; and Florida investment firm, Rayond James Financial Inc. The companies have declined to comment on the cases.
Another pending case involves UBS AG, the Swiss bank. An attorney says the Labor Department has asked him to show that the UBS unit that employed his client is covered under the act. UBS declined to comment. Jennifer Levitz, (Copyright 2008 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved, Reprinted with permission, ED. P. 2019)
Under California Labor Code Section 1102.5, the law “prohibits retaliation against an employee who disclosed, or the employer believes the employee disclosed or may disclose, inform to certain government agencies, or those who authority over the employee or authority to investigate, discover or correct the employer’s violation or noncompliance, or for providing information to or testifying before, any public body conducting an investigation, hearing or inquiry, if the employee has reasonable cause to believe that the information discloses a violation of state or federal statute, or a violation of, or noncompliance with a local, state or federal rule or regulation, regardless of whether disclosing the information is part of the employee’s job duties.”
If a whistleblower has a reasonable suspicion that a violation of a local, state or federal rule of regulation occurred, the employee’s motivation for reporting the conduct is irrelevant to whether the disclosure is a protected activity. (Mize-Kurzman v. Marin Community College District (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 832)
Research:
Leahy, Grassley Press for Update on Labor Department’s Handling of Whistleblower Cases, Oct 07, 2010
Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Legal Protection for Corporate Whistleblowers, By Stephen M. Kohn,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Links to an external site.)
EMPLOYEE PROTECTION PROGRAM
https://www.whistleblowers.gov/ (Links to an external site.)
War on Whistleblowers (Video: Go to FCC Website, Click on FCC Library – Click on Research Databases click on “Flims on Demand”; type in War on Whistleblowers)
http://fod.infobase.com/p_ViewVideo.aspx?xtid=93966&tScript=0 (Links to an external site.)
General Information About Whistleblowing and Retaliation
https://www.workplacefairness.org/general-whistleblowing#9 (Links to an external site.)
How Companies Should Respond to Whistleblower Complaints
by Paul B. Murphy (Links to an external site.), Amelia R. Medina (Links to an external site.) and James L. Michaels (Links to an external site.) | December 2, 2014 at 6:01 am
Mize-Kurzman v. Marin Community College District (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 832
Questions for your Paper:
- Write a brief introduction to the paper as to what this case is about, include the whistleblower-protection provisions of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, specifically of California’s Whistleblower Statutes?
- After doing your research based on the information above, are the employees of subsidiaries covered under the SARBOX Act? Why or why not? If not, shouldn’t they?
- Was the Department of Labor “violating the “spirit and goals” of a federal law aimed at protecting employees who report corporate wrongdoing?” Why or why not? Write a compelling argument.
- As an employer, supervisor, manager, HR Director, etc., what are your specific responsibilities towards employees who have, or may be preparing to “blow the whistle”, on your companies’ practices or policies according to Section 1102.5 of the California Labor Code?
- How should companies go about properly engaging in the activity of correcting the issues raised by the whistleblower?
- Conclusion: Regarding the Mize-Kurzman v. Marin Community College District (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 832); “In this case, the trial court allowed the jury to consider the evidence of plaintiff’s retirement benefits on the issue of damages. It allowed the jury to determine whether to reduce her damages, if any, and the amount by which any damages would be reduced. No California case cited by the parties or found by us [Opinion of the Court] discusses the question whether the availability of retirement benefits may be considered in mitigation of damages sustained by a wrongfully terminated or demoted employee.” Therefore, “The judgment is reversed and the matter remanded for retrial in accordance with the views set forth herein. Plaintiff shall recover her costs on this appeal.” In your conclusion of this paper, discuss the importance of this case and its significance, in your own words as to how this effects the business environment from a legal standpoint. Also briefly discuss the ramifications, had this case not been remanded, and how it could have effected existing Whistleblowing laws on a state and federal level.
Other requirements: MLA Format, works cited page, no plagiarism.
California State University Fresno Sarbanes Oxley Act Policy Discussion Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]
San Diego State University President of the San Diego Tourism Authority HW Writing Assignment Help
QUESTION 1
- Why and how do tourists develop and/or resort to stereotypes while traveling away from their home environment? Why are stereotypes often inaccurate? Why are stereotypes helpful? Why are stereotypes dangerous? How can we modify and/or eliminate stereotypes? Your answer must be a minimum of 700 words and maximum of 1000 words.
QUESTION 2
- If you were the President of the San Diego Tourism Authority, how would you go about evaluating satisfaction levels of tourists visiting the region? Which technique of satisfaction measurement would be the most adequate? Describe this technique? Why should international tourist complaints not always be used in assessing their vacation satisfaction? Your answer must be a minimum of 700 words and maximum of 1000 words.
[supanova_question]
COMM170 University of North Subaltern Counterpublic Paper Writing Assignment Help
COMM 170: Rhetoric and Public IssuesAssignment 6: Final Counterpublic Rhetoric Essay (70 points) Check the course schedule for the due date.In this essay, you will synthesize and revise the shorter essays you produced in Assignments 4 and 5. The result will be an essay that is 2000-2500 words. You will make an argument in a clearly stated thesis statement highlighted in boldface typethat addresses this central question: What is the difference between the rhetoric that your counterpublic uses and the rhetoric that it critiques, and how is the difference between these two types of rhetoric important to the way that the counterpublic advocates for the public issues that are relevant to it? Revise and integrate the writing you did in Assignments 4 and 5. You should make sure, however, that your essay is constructed to specifically support the argument made in your thesis statement.
[supanova_question]
College America – Phoenix A Memoir of a Family and Culture in Crisis Essay Writing Assignment Help
At least 1500 words…Using the sources provided
For your final paper, you will write a compare and contrast analysis of JD Vance’s
Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir of a Family and Culture in Crisis and Ta-Nahisi Coates’s
Between the World and Me. While your opinions of these two memoirs is certainly
important and valid, you will mainly want to compare and contrast how these two authors
address similar topics.
Here are some points of comparison that you may want to use in your essay:
• Their experiences as children
• Their experiences in college/what they got out of their individual educations
• What their respective communities are like
• What their respective family lives are like
• How each author addresses the idea of personal responsibility
• Their outlook on divisiveness (racial, political, socioeconomic status, etc.)
• Their hope for the future
• Their concept of the American dream
• How each author promotes empathy
[supanova_question]
Mesa Community College Boswell Vaping Crisis in California Research Essay Writing Assignment Help
My topic is Vaping Crisis in California
Writing Task: You will choose one controversial, local issue, to write about in a six-eight page, research-based, persuasive essay. In addition to devising an arguable claim, you will convince your readers (including myself) to take some type of action (this is where the “proposal” aspect comes into play). It is vital to choose a subject that you find interesting, but keep an open mind while you’re doing your research. To build an effective argument, you need to present the best positions, which support your ideas as well as demonstrate why the best positions against your ideas (the counter argument) are insufficient.
Requirements for Sources:
- Your essay must have at least six credible/reliable sources
- You must include at least one article from an electronic database
- You can use magazines (e.g. Time, Rolling Stone, GQ) and newspapers (e.g. San Diego Union Tribune, New York Times) **the web sites are fine, of course
- Do not use general encyclopedic works (eg., the dictionary, the Encyclopedia Britannica, Wikipedia) in your essay
- You should also consider contacting people by telephone or email. If you need help formulating questions or with anything else, please let me know
- You could also do a survey and analyze the data
- Start as soon as possible
Include a works cited page
[supanova_question]
https://anyessayhelp.com/
Questions for your Paper:
- Write a brief introduction to the paper as to what this case is about, include the whistleblower-protection provisions of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, specifically of California’s Whistleblower Statutes?
- After doing your research based on the information above, are the employees of subsidiaries covered under the SARBOX Act? Why or why not? If not, shouldn’t they?
- Was the Department of Labor “violating the “spirit and goals” of a federal law aimed at protecting employees who report corporate wrongdoing?” Why or why not? Write a compelling argument.
- As an employer, supervisor, manager, HR Director, etc., what are your specific responsibilities towards employees who have, or may be preparing to “blow the whistle”, on your companies’ practices or policies according to Section 1102.5 of the California Labor Code?
- How should companies go about properly engaging in the activity of correcting the issues raised by the whistleblower?
- Conclusion: Regarding the Mize-Kurzman v. Marin Community College District (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 832); “In this case, the trial court allowed the jury to consider the evidence of plaintiff’s retirement benefits on the issue of damages. It allowed the jury to determine whether to reduce her damages, if any, and the amount by which any damages would be reduced. No California case cited by the parties or found by us [Opinion of the Court] discusses the question whether the availability of retirement benefits may be considered in mitigation of damages sustained by a wrongfully terminated or demoted employee.” Therefore, “The judgment is reversed and the matter remanded for retrial in accordance with the views set forth herein. Plaintiff shall recover her costs on this appeal.” In your conclusion of this paper, discuss the importance of this case and its significance, in your own words as to how this effects the business environment from a legal standpoint. Also briefly discuss the ramifications, had this case not been remanded, and how it could have effected existing Whistleblowing laws on a state and federal level.
Other requirements: MLA Format, works cited page, no plagiarism.