Using the results of your work from week two project Identify Overall Scope/ Analysis of Unexpected Results, assignment help Business Finance Assignment Help

This is a three part project. Please see the reference attachments also. This can not be plagiarized. I will tip generously for quality work!

PROJECT 1

Project 1

For the purposes of this project, imagine you are an Information Security (InfoSec) Specialist,an employee of the Makestuff Company, assigned to the company’s Incident Response Team.

In this case, you have been notified by Mr. Hirum Andfirum, Human Resources Director for the Makestuff Company, that the company has just terminated Mr. Got Yourprop, a former engineer in the company’s New Products Division, for cause.  Mr. Andfirum tells you that at Mr. Yourprop’s exit interviewearlier that day, the terminated employee made several statements to the effect of “it is okay because I have a new job already and they were VERY happy to have me come from Makestuff, with ALL I have to offer.”  Mr. Yourprop’s statements made Mr. Andfirum fear he might be taking Makestuff’s intellectual property with him to his new employer (undoubtedly a Makestuff competitor).  In particular, Mr. Andfirum is worried about the loss of the source code for “Product X,” which the company is counting on to earn millions in revenue over the next three years.  Mr. Andfirum provides you a copy of the source code to use in your investigation.  Lastly, Mr. Andfirum tells you to remember that the Company wants to retain the option to refer the investigation to law enforcement in the future, so anything you do should be with thought about later potential admissibility in court.

The 4^th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”  While the 4^th Amendment is most commonly interpreted to only affect/restrict governmental power (e.g., law enforcement), the fact that a formal criminal investigation is a possibility (and the Company has no desire to be named in a civil lawsuit) means you must consider its effect your actions.

With the above scenario in mind, thoroughly answer the following questions (in paragraph format, properly citing outside research, where appropriate).

1. Can you (or Mr. Yourprop’s supervisor) search Yourprop’s personal vehicle currently parked in the Company parking lot for digital evidence?  Support your answer.

2. If evidence of this theft of intellectual property can be found, Makestuff Company may seek to pursue criminal prosecution. Can Mr. Yourprop’s supervisor direct local police investigators to search his personal vehicle which is parked on the Company parking lot?  Support your answer.

3. Can (or Mr. Yourprop’s supervisor) search Yourprop’s assigned locker in the Company’s on-site gym for digital evidence?  Support your answer.

4. Can (or Mr. Yourprop’s supervisor) use a master key to search Yourprop’s locked desk after he has left the premises for digital evidence?  Support your answer.

5. There is a page in the Company’s “Employee Handbook” that states that anything brought onto the Company’s property, including the employees themselves, is subject to random search for items belonging to the Company.  There is a space for the employee to acknowledge receipt of this notice.  Mr. Yourprop has a copy of the handbook but never signed the page. Does that matter? Explain.

6. Makestuff Company uses a security checkpoint at the entrance to the building. A sign adjacent to the checkpoint states that the purpose of the checkpoint is for security staff to check for weapons or other materials that may be detrimental to the working environment or employee safety. Screening is casual and usually consists of verification of an employee’s Company ID card. Can security staff at this checkpoint be directed to open Mr. Yourprop’s briefcase and seize any potential digital evidence?  Support your answer.

Project Requirements:

• Each question should be answered with a minimum of 1-2 paragraphs, so do your research, be specific, be detailed, and demonstrate your knowledge;
• Answers to the above questions should be submitted in a single document (.DOC/.DOCX, .RTF, or .PDF), with answers separated so as to make it clear which question is being answered;
• The submission should have a cover page, including course number, course title, title of paper, student’s name, date of submission;
• Format: 12-point font, double-space, one-inch margins;
• It is mandatory that you do some research, and utilize outside resources!  References page: APA citation style (see https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/ for help). 

PROJECT 2

• For the purpose of this Project, you are still the InfoSec Specialist for the Makestuff Company. Consider this project a continuation of the work you performed in Project 1.

With the scenario in mind, thoroughly answer the following questions (in paragraph format, properly citing outside research, where appropriate):

1.  What permissions/authorities should you have before you search Mr. Yourprop’s former Company work area, and how would you document that authority?

2.      Look at the photo of Mr. Yourprop’s work area. (See file attachment Work_Area.jpg)  Identify three (3) potential items of digital evidence you see in the photo.  For EACH item of digital evidence you identified, explain what potential use that item would be to your investigation (e.g., what type of data that item might hold) AND how you would collect that item as evidence (with emphasis on your care and handling of that item consistent with digital forensic best practices described in your textbook).

3.      Look at the photo of Mr. Yourprop’s work area. (See file attachment Work_Area.jpg)  Identify three (3) potential items of non-digital evidence you see in the photo.  For EACH item of non-digital evidence you identified, explain what potential use that item would be to your investigation AND how you would collect that item as evidence.

4.      Look at the Evidence Custody Document (See file attachment Evidence Custody Document.doc) and item photographs (Items-seized(pics).pptx) Read the Evidence Custody Document prepared by one of your co-workers, in which he is attempting to seize the three items pictured in the accompanying photos.  Did your co-worker adequately describe each item? What could you add to the descriptions, and for which items (based on what you see in the photos), to make them more complete and serve as an example to your co-worker of what they SHOULD look like?

5.  How should the items you collected as evidence be stored in your evidence room.  Describe any environmental conditions or concerns for your evidence room (digital evidence can require some unique considerations!), as well any security procedures that should be in place.

• Project Requirements:

• Each questions should be answered with a minimum of 1-2 paragraphs, so do your research, be specific, be detailed, and demonstrate your knowledge;
• Answers to the above questions should be submitted in a single document (.DOC/.DOCX, .RTF, or .PDF), with answers separated so as to make it clear which question is being answered;
• The submission should have a cover page, including course number, course title, title of paper, student’s name, date of submission, and submit to the assignments folder.
• Format: 12-point font, double-space, one-inch margins;
• It is mandatory that you do some research, and utilize outside resources!  References page: APA citation style (see https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/ for help).

FINAL PROJECT

Final Project

PART 1

In the course of this investigation you, as the InfoSec Specialist for Makestuff Company, have or will need to interview (or perhaps “interrogate”) several people to provide context for the evidence you have collected as well as the rational for your searches .

• Provide a list of people you have or will interview. 
• Provide a narrative description of the interview setting and the intended process, before, during and following the interview.
• Explain why these stages are important to a successful interview and investigation.

PART 2

For the purpose of the first part of this Project, you are still the InfoSec Specialist for the Makestuff Company. Consider this project a continuation of the work you performed in Projects 1 and 2.

After seeing you search Mr. Yourprop’s work area and take several pieces of evidence, Ms. Maria Friend, who works in the office across the hall, comes forward with an odd story.  Ms. Friend states that she is Mr. Yourprop’s fiancé, but lately things in their relationship had begun to sour.  She produces a thumb drive she says Mr. Yourprop gave her earlier that day.  She tells you Mr. Yourprop told her to “keep it safe” and asked her to bring it home with her at the end of the day.  Ms. Friend tells you she really likes her job and has no interest in being wrapped up in whatever Mr. Yourprop has done to invite negative attention.

1.  How would you package the thumb drive for shipment to the lab? Be specific as to what materials you would use, and why?

2.  What would you ask the lab to look for on the submitted thumb drive, and why?

3.  Are there any locations outside of Mr. Yourprop’s immediate workspace where pertinent digital evidence might be found to help with your intellectual property theft case? Explain thoroughly.

Now, please assume a different character for the purpose of this next segment of the assessment…You are a forensic examiner at the above mentioned Makestuff Company lab.  After receiving the package from the InfoSec Specialist in the field, you sign the chain of custody form and get set to begin your examination.

4.  How would you protect this thumb drive prior to creating a forensic image for examination?  Why is this protection important to your overall case? Explain thoroughly.

5.  Discuss at least three forensic examination/analysis tools that could be used by you or Makestuff Company’s other digital forensic analysts to process/analyze the thumb drive you received (be specific), ensuring you include the manufacturer of each tool and each tool’s capabilities.

Fortunately, the InfoSec Specialist was on his/her game, and ALSO sent you copies of several files, reported to be the source code of “Product X”.

6.  What is hashing, and how could you take advantage of it in this case to attempt to determine if Mr. Yourprop’s thumb drive contains copies of the source code? Explain thoroughly.

You complete your laboratory examination and return the evidence, with your report, back to the InfoSec Specialist at the field office.

Now, back at the field office, the InfoSec Specialist (a.k.a., you) receives the report from the Makestuff Lab, which shows that the complete “Product X” source code was found on Mr. Yourprop’s thumb drive.  In addition, while the evidence was at the lab for examination, you determined it is also likely that Mr. Yourprop emailed copies of the source code to his personal email address.

7.  Do you recommend reporting the crime to law enforcement? Why or why not? Are private companies required to report crimes to law enforcement?

The decision is ultimately made to report the theft to law enforcement and, using primarily the evidence you developed during your investigation, Mr. Yourprop is brought to trial for the crime.  You (as the forensic examiner from the Makestuff Lab) are qualified as an expert witness and called to testify.

8.  What is the significance of you being qualified as an expert witness? How is it different from being a simple fact witness? Explain thoroughly.

9.  While you are on the stand, the defense asks you the following question based on the fact that you write a personal blog about digital forensics in your off-time, from which it appears you are a staunch supporter of law enforcement. “How do we know you were not just a “police hack” in this case, choosing to report only what would help law enforcement and your company’s bottom-line in this case?”

Project Requirements:

• Each questions should be answered with a minimum of 1-2 paragraphs, so do your research, be specific, be detailed, and demonstrate your knowledge; submit your project to the assignments folder.
• Answers to the above questions should be submitted in a single document (.DOC/.DOCX, .RTF, or .PDF), with answers separated so as to make it clear which question is being answered;
• The submission should have a cover page, including course number, course title, title of paper, student’s name, date of submission;
• Format: 12-point font, double-space, one-inch margins;
• It is mandatory that you do some research, and utilize outside resources!  References page: APA citation style (see https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/ for help).

Checkpoint Assignment 03: Annotated Bibliography

To help you in building a good Literature Review, we will go
through the process of building an Annotated Bibliography. For this
Bibliography you will be required to list the source and provide a brief
description of the piece and why it might be helpful to developing your
subject. If you are unfamiliar or have forgotten the elements of an Annotated
Bibliography, you can review with the links in the Resource section of this
module.

Sources should principally come from scholarly journals,
research thesis, and dissertations. Web pages will not count, though you should
feel free to list them in this assignment for later referencing in the
literature review. This is when using Psych Articles through the Library will
come in very handy, though there are also a number of resources on the
internet.

You will need to identify a minimum of 25 resources. The
bibliography should be submitted as an APA style reference section and follow
all APA formatting. If you need help with that you may want to refer to the
Resource Section of this Module.

When completed, upload your document.

EXAMPLE

E. G. (2002). Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A
meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin,128(4),
539-579. Retrieved May 15, 2015, from http://psycnet.apa.org/?fa=main.doiLanding&doi=10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.539

This research provides a
meta-analysis discussing the association between corporal punishment and 11
child behaviors and experiences. Since the article provides specific findings
and explanations it can be helpful in determining the effects of corporal
punishment and how further research may help clarify the role of corporal punishment.

The research is about Moral Development.  and this the outline

Titleof

Paper

Your

Name

Central Christian
College of Kansas

Page 2: Running
Head:

TitleofPaper

2

ABSTRACT

Highlight this section and enter you

r abstract here (100

–

250

words

Page 3 CONTENTS

Abstract

2

Introduction

4

Statement of the Research Problem

Error!

Bookmark not defined.

Purpose of the Study

Error! Bookmark not defined.

Hypothesis

4

Literature Review

5

Findings

6

Introduction

7

Results

8

Summary, Conclusion, And
Recommendations

.

9

Summary

10

Conclusions and Recommendations

11

References

Page 4

Running Head:

TitleofPaper

INTRODUCTION

PlaceTextHere

Purpose of the Study

PlaceTextHere

Research Question &

Hypothesis

PlaceTextHere

Page 5

TitleofPaper

LITERATURE REVIEW

PlaceTextHere

Page 6

TitleofPaper

FINDINGS

Introduction

PlaceTextHere

Results

PlaceTextHere

Page 7

Running Head:

TitleofPaper

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION,

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary

PlaceTextHere

Conclusions and Recommendations

PlaceTextHere

Watch the videos “Learning As We Grow – Development and Learning,” “Building on What We Know: Cognitive Processing,” and “Feelings Count – Emotions and Learning,” and respond to the questions provided below in a 750-1,000-word evaluation:

Supporting Children as They Grow: Middle Childhood

1. What do you notice about the strategies Ms. MacLean uses to teach her students about observation and data collection?
2. How are these strategies particularly appropriate to young children?
3. What strategies does Ms. MacLean use to assess her students’ learning? 
4. What do you think a teacher can learn about students’ thinking from strategies like these? 
5. How does Ms. MacLean’s teaching develop her students’ readiness as well as respond to where the students are developmentally?

Supporting Children as They Grow: Later Childhood

1. What do you notice Mr. Mixon doing to encourage his students’ development of hypotheses?
2. How does Mr. Mixon’s teaching support his students’ development of formal operational reasoning or abstract thinking?

Supporting Children as They Grow: Adolescence

1. What do you feel is most effective about how Mr. Gillam encourages his students to evaluate evidence, draw inferences, and predict outcomes?
2. How does Mr.Gillam’s teaching help his students deepen their formal operational reasoning?
3. What do you notice about the additional abilities of students at each developmental level?
4. What are older students capable of that younger students were not yet ready to do?
5. What do you think helped them develop these abilities? 

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines

Research Question & Hypothesis

By completing your annotated bibliography you have already
become more informed about your topic. This make you uniquely qualified to
develop a Research Question and Hypothesis, which will be influenced by what
you are reading.

In some ways, this is just the next evolution of your
introduction, especially that last paragraph. If so, this process should be
pretty easy. However, it might be that through your reading you have become
better informed and so are ready to clarify your research or perhaps even
modify your direction slightly. Either way, by writing this Research Question
we will also be requiring you to articulate a Hypothesis, which represents what
you believe your research will confirm. This requires you to be very specific
about what you believe your research will prove.

Once you submit your Research Question and Hypothesis these
will become the guiding aspects of your research. Later you will be addressing
whether your hypothesis was right or wrong as part of your Findings/Conclusion.
Don’t worry though – right or wrong has nothing to do with your grade. In fact,
many times a wrong hypothesis can be as informative as a correct one. The point
is not whether you are right or wrong, but what the research says. So, no
worries.

As you write your Research Question and Hypothesis, keep in
mind that a Research Question tends to represent the broader focus of the
research, where a Hypothesis tends to be predictive of some outcome that the
research will need to address. That means we want you to be as specific as
possible with your hypothesis – take a position.

You may want to write multiple questions and hypotheses
before deciding on one set. Think of it as trying on clothes – by creating multiple
statements you get a chance to see which ones work best for you.

Examples
Research Question	Hypothesis
Is corporal punishment an effective technique to shape behavior?	Corporal punishment is not an effective method of behavior management in children, as it leads to further aggression or mental instability.
Is corporal punishment an effective technique to shape behavior?	Corporal punishment is an effective means of behavior management and does not result in negative emotional residue.

That is the second part of the assignment.  Still on “moral Development”

Please let me know if you will be able to do it.