Visual theory-practice relationship Health Medical Assignment Help

1. From the list below, choose ONE of the questions/problems facing the United States. I have identified the issue and provided you with one or two sources, which you must use in your paper. In one case, I provide an optional source.
2. While you may already have a position, do not formulate your conclusion until thoroughly researching a diversity of perspectives on the issue. Practice the critical thinking skills you have learned in this module and keep an open mind.Give yourself over to the research and the process of discovery–about the issue and about yourself. Tompkins shares a lot with her readers, and this in turn strengthens her argument.
3. Conduct extensive research on the question/problem (primary, secondary, and tertiary sources) and then narrow them down to best represent a diversity of perspectives in your paper. You are not restricted to U.S. sources.
4. Once you determine your conclusion/major claim, identify your audience, which should be uninformedand/or resistant to your position. Like Tompkins, you are going to take them through your research to lead them to your conclusion.
5. Use inductive reasoning and Tompkins’ structure as a model for the writing of your essay:
   • narrate history and personal relationship (experiential, observational, and or intellectual) to the question/problem;
   • establish broader, national context for question/problem;
   • present/define question/problem;
   • summarize, analyze, and evaluate select research representing a diversity of perspectives;
   • synthesize response to research;
   • present your conclusion, your resolution or solution to the question/problem (which may side with one or more of your sources), and provide reasons and evidence to support it;
   • if applicable, share any new question/s or problem/s encountered as a result of your research and critical thinking (as Tompkins did in her last paragraph).
6. Adapt Tompkins’ style and tone with your own; it is particularly effective for a resistant audience, a way of showing (rather than “telling”) and persuading them to arrive at your conclusion. Yes, you may use “I,” as you are taking your audience through your epistemological adventure, but be strategic with it.
7. Note: Rarely is this type of argument meant to utterly convince an audience; in fact, it is enough to just get a resistant audience to reconsider their own position/perspective in light of your own. One might also say that many people do not have fully informed opinions on subjects–this paper counters that. Arguments at this level are not about “winning,” and this is not a course in debate.

List of Contemporary Questions/Problems Facing the United States (you must choose one):

While the Grossmont College Databases are excellent and should be used, you should also have no problem finding a plethora of perspectives on any of these current questions and problems.

1. Should the United States provide reparations for slavery? “The Case for Reparations” (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. by Ta-Nehisi Coates
2. Should Confederate monuments be removed from public spaces? “Confederate Statues Honor Timeless Virtues–Let them Stay” (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. by Arthur Herman
3. Migrants at Southern Border. “What We Know: Family Separation And ‘Zero Tolerance’ At The Border” (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. by Camila Domonoske and Richard Gonzales
4. Trade Wars. “The President’s 2017 Trade Policy Agenda” (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
5. Is Hip-Hop harmful? Both of these sources must be used: “Can Hip-Hop Inspire a New Generation of Architects?” (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.and “Jazz Trumpeter Wynton Marsalis Calls Rap Music ‘more damaging than a statue of Robert E. Lee’,” (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. by Ben Kaye. One more optional source you might want to include:

Requirements

Final essay should be:

1. a clear response to the directions;
2. 8-12 pages in length;
3. in correct MLA format and style, including in-text citations and the Works Cited page (do not include a cover page);
4. well organized with effective transitions between ideas and paragraphs;
5. efficient with regards to close work with sources, including, but not limited to, precise and concise summary and the smooth integration of direct quotes, block quotes, and paraphrases;
6. the product of original, deep critical thinking, both with regards to content and form.
7. meticulously proofread and primarily free of sentence-level errors;
8. contain a minimum of eight sources (including the one I have provided).

ALSO PLease

make sure it is a unique essay because we use vericite

Development of the Monte Carlo wind speed simulation

Data analysis

Method construction

2. Verification of data

Filter the raw wind speed data with respect to unusual and unrealistic wind speed

observations

Verify the power curve of the test wind turbines

• Rated power given by manufacturer 2.5 kW

kW) by comparing the

calculation to the actual power production data

3. Verification of method

Conduct autocorrelation analysis of the wind speed data to determine the length of blocks

in the MC wind speed simulation

Generate estimates of the wind speed densities based on the MC wind speed simulation

and compare these estimates to the density based

on actual wind speed observations from the site; This is done at a 10 m measurement height

Simulate AEP assuming the test wind turbines based on the 2.5kW power

curve and compare these values to the observed AEP to evaluate the accuracy of the

two wind speed simulations

more details and data to validate the model will be given

1.

In the media piece provided, read Case 8: Knottyville Country Club (linked in the Resources), which addresses asset misappropriation risk factors, and post your answers to the questions. Your lists should include 2–3 items with an explanation. Your initial post should be about 200 words https://media.capella.edu/CourseMedia/BUS4110/knottyvilleCountryClub/wrapper.asp

2.

In the media piece provided, read Case 20: Moha Computer Services Limited (linked in the Resources), which addresses corporate governance and professional ethics. Answer the questions at the end of the case. Your initial post should be about 200 words

https://media.capella.edu/CourseMedia/BUS4110/mohaComputerServicesLimited/wrapper.asp

3.

In the media piece provided, read part two of Case 22: TechTennis USA (linked in the Resources), beginning with “Gathering Evidence Part II: Other Information.” Post your response to questions 6–10 at the end of the case. Your initial post should be about 200 words

https://media.capella.edu/CourseMedia/BUS4110/techTennis/wrapper.asp

Read the following paragraph, write 300 words response, and answer the question he put in the last sentence.

In the chapter titled “Ecocentrism: the Land Ethic” in the “Sand County Almanac,” Aldo Leopold states the lack development of a land ethic has to led to ecological disasters. Throughout the chapter he mentions how our treatment of land as property has led to the creation of a relationship with land that is “strictly economic, entailing privileges but not obligations” (Leopold, 104).

As human beings, we are trained to act ethically towards all other humans, however we do not extend this same consideration toward animals, soils, waters, plants. Our lack of ethical consideration toward this world community has led to an ecological imbalance that has already wreaked havoc on the world. Leopold asserts that the land ethic is simply an expansion of the moral community circle to include everything of the land. It is important to note, Leopold doe not mention that a land ethic already existed in Native American culture and history; he focuses mainly on the Western perspective. I think it can be argued that this lack of acknowledgment is revealing and begs the question, “Why didn’t great academic, North American conservationists like Leopold study Native Americans and their relationship with land?”

Several of the accounts by Native American authors mentions Native perception of land as a living entity- as a mother. There is a relationship between people and land. However, Western treatment of land as a commodity producer- an object- has led to loss of identity with the land. The lack of land ethic (along with objectifying the different components that make up land) has allowed for a situation like the one taking place at Alberta Tar Sands in Canada. In the documentary, “Standing on Sacred Ground: Profit and Loss” it is apparent that a profit motivated treatment of land has introduced a plethora of problems (like cancers in people and animal life along with polluting of the major waterways, etc) near these areas of operations. Perhaps the damage we are wreaking on our planet could have been mitigated had settler groups and non-Indians studied from Natives?