Directions

For this Assignment, identify a new information system you would recommend for

implementation and testing in your organization. This can be a new EHR, BCMA, CPOE, or

CDSS system, or a database to aggregate patient data, etc.

Provide a rationale for its implementation, including literature support for this new system, along

with the process you would recommend to test this system, using at least seven of the tests

noted in Table 12.2. Provide the name of the test, what the test is used for, along with a brief

explanation of how you would conduct this test. This entire testing process (the examples of

how the tests would be conducted) should involve all organizational stakeholders in some way

so as to help build relationships between stakeholders. Note how you would evaluate the

outcome of these tests and how you would determine if the system should be recommended for

continued use in the organization. Include at least 10 references.

Your final work should include:

 Title and reference pages (10 references minimum)

 An introduction

 New system recommendation and rationale

 A literature review

 Use of at least seven tests

 Evaluation and recommendations

 A conclusion

See the grading rubric under Course Resources for details on how this Assignment will be

evaluated.

Assignment Requirements

The finished Assignment should be approximately seven (7) pages, excluding the title and

reference pages. The viewpoint and purpose of this Assignment should be clearly established

and sustained.

Before finalizing your work, you should:

● be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above)

● consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Resources) to make sure you have

included everything necessary;

● utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors; and

● review APA formatting and citation information found in the Writing Center, online, or

elsewhere in the course.

Your writing Assignment should:

● follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;

● display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and

● use APA 6th edition format for organization, style, and crediting sources including:

○ properly formatted header

○ 12-point, double-spaced, Times New Roman font

○ use of in-text citations

○ title page and reference page

○ use of headings (if applicable

My topic is about : food security and GMO food in India

1) Briefly describe how you found the source you’ve selected, including search terms you used, any help you received from librarians, friends, or peers, the databases you searched, and how you ensured this was a credible source. If your search terms changed over time, or you looked at multiple databases, please include that information. In other words, tell me the story of finding this source from start to finish.

2) Start by providing the enthymeme you’re working with for your Essay 2. Be sure to double check its format and logic. Briefly explain how the source you shared will help you to persuade your reader to accept this argument. What part of the argument will it address? What types of evidence will your pull from the source to support your claims (it might be helpful to review See attached file, important) It doesn’t matter how you see this source fitting in; I’m interested in reading your thinking behind choosing this source (and it’s OK if it ends up not being in your final Essay #2. That’s normal in research!)

3) What parts of Essay 2’s argument will this source be unable to support? In other words, what are the limits of this source’s utility to your essay? Please explain your answer.

To Full Minimum Requirements for this Thread:

1) Your Initial Post must be a minimum of 350 words, total.

I have to reply to 2 peer’s post. Please find the attachment of both peers reply. Please compose reply for both posts in the attached documents.

Each response should be minimum of 150 words excluding reference. Also, cite and provide references for your reply.

Requirement

Forums Guidelines Criteria	Requirements
Quality Guidelines (50%):	Responses are original in content with a minimum of one external reference. All posts demonstrated analysis of the topic. Responses to classmates are significant and advanced the discussion.
Participation Guidelines (30%):	Responses to classmates are at least 200 words.
Clarity, Organization & Professionalism Guidelines (20%):	Responses were organized and logical. No spelling or grammatical errors. References were used and cited properly. Appropriate language, respect and consideration toward peers/instructor.

I Need total of two of these paper assignment

Papers/Projects

• 
  

  Required Discussion Posts

  There are six required discussion posts. The first must be completed before the second week of class to demonstrate participation. The other assignments may be completed any time prior to 8:00 AM Central on Monday, August 6.The recommended completion dates are one per week.NOTE: If you have not read the plagiarism statement on the left hand menu, stop and do so. When you submit your second discussion assignment you are also acknowledging having read the statement and are responsible for understanding its contents.Instructions: Follow the “Discussions” link on the menu, open and read the appropriate assignment, and post your response by adding a thread.
  Grading: The first discussion is required to show participation during the first week. Each other discussion is worth two points for a total of ten points toward your course grade Full credit will be given to those that are at least 50 words in length, are written with minimal distractions regarding style and grammar, stay on topic, and successfully address the chosen prompt. Keep in mind that these are not intended to be research assignments beyond basic information provided by the textbook. Instead they are exercises in personal reactions to subject matter.

• 
  

  Writing Assignment – 20 Points

  Deadline: 8:00 AM Monday, August 6.May be submitted any time prior to the deadline. OverviewThis assignment requires you to identify, describe, and analyze some work of visual art significant to your location or some place you have lived previously. The format of the assignment must be typed and double-spaced, must correspond with the list of questions below, and be submitted through the link below. The length is determined by thoroughly responding to each question. The final word count is not likely to be fewer than 500 words.TopicPick any interesting work of art in the region where you currently live, or some place you have lived in the past. “Region” can be a state, the South, a country, an area where they speak a common language or share a common culture, etc. In other words, it’s fairly broadly defined.The work you choose should be available for the public to see. It can be a work in a museum or gallery, a significant work of architecture, or a public monument. The project must be in your own words. The first part is the only one that invites you to look up information. Everything else should reflect your own thought process.”Art” is understood as coming from human imagination and craft. In other words, do not choose natural objects that have no application of human skill.QuestionsYour paper should clearly distinguish your answers. It is best to simply number your responses, and add nothing that does not belong in that section.1. What work have you chosen and where is it? How old is it? Who is responsible for it? Provide relevant details about the medium/materials. Say exactly what sources were used for this information.2. Provide a detailed description of the work. Assume your reader has not seen it, and you are trying to recreate it in their minds as accurately as possible.3. Explain why you were drawn to this work.4. Provide an analysis of the work. This should include a thesis statement and illustration or evidence to support that statement. This should be your longest answer. An analysis can be many things. Sometimes it is looking for some meaning in the work (what is someone trying to say?), but it might also be a process of looking at how parts make up awhole. It might be a matter of looking at the larger context, how the work reflects the culture or historical period it belongs to (or contradicts those). It can also be viewed within the context of an artist’s other works. The voice presentations under Lessons 4 and 8 are intended to provide samples of analytical approaches.If you find it easiest to compare the work to something appropriate, that is often a useful technique for building an analysis.CriteriaThese will be graded on the following:1. Organization – the paper should be logically arranged according to the questions provided, with each section well-structured.2. Development – each section should have sufficient and relevant detail and thought.
  3. Clarity – I look at all elements of writing, so the paper should show attention to details like sentence structure, editing, formatting, punctuation, word choice, and tone.4. Subject Matter – the subject of your paper is up to you within the boundaries described, but its significance and depth will help produce a fully developed paper. TNo credit will be given to plagiarized work. See plagiarism statement.
  

• 
  

  Submit Writing Assignment Here

  • Complete your assignment using a word-processing software such as Microsoft Word and Open Office (download free software at http://www.openoffice.org/).
  • Save your document as .rtf to ensure that it can be opened at any computer.
  • No assignments will be accepted by email.
• 
  

  Helpful Resources for Papers/Projects

  Here are links to helpful tools that will aid you in your papers and projects.Citation

  • APA
  • MLA
  • Son of Citation Machine

  Creating PowerPoints

  • PowerPoints

  Research

  • Oveta Culp Hobby Memorial Library

  Presentations Options

  • Prezi

  Central Texas College Tutoring for Writing

  • Writing Tutoring

  Free Software

  • Microsoft Office 365