Warren E. Buffett, 1995 Case Analysis Business Finance Assignment Help

Instructions

Given the two methods below, develop a hypothetical design plan for each method based on your envisioned dissertation topic:

1. Quantitative
2. Qualitative

For each hypothetical design, provide a discussion of the appropriateness based on course texts and/or suitable supplemental foundational research sources.

Support your paper with a minimum of 5 resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included.

Length: 5-7 pages not including title and reference pages
References: Minimum of 5 scholarly resources.

Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts that are presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your paper should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Review APA Form and Style.

Be sure to adhere to Northcentral University’s Academic Integrity Policy.

The purpose of this assignment is to use the knowledge you have gained in this unit about the elements of non-fiction and relate them to The Motorcycle Diaries book and film. You will learn in this assignment how to apply these elements to the main idea or theme through topics such as journeys, travel, adventure, and odyssey.

Directions

1. Consider the following quotations from the excerpts you read. They deal with the topic of journeys, adventure, and travel, significant topics in this story. Think about the lessons or observations of human experience that arise.
   • I now know, by an almost fatalistic conformity with the facts, that my destiny is to travel, or perhaps it’s better to say that traveling is our destiny, because Alberto feels the same. Still there are moments when I think with profound longing of those wonderful areas in our south. Perhaps one day, tired of circling the world, I’ll return to Argentina and settle in the Andean lakes, if not indefinitely then at least for a pause while I shift from one understanding of the world to another. (p. 45)
     AND
   • There we understood our vocation, our true vocation, was to move for eternity along the roads and seas of the world. Always curious, looking into everything that came before our eyes, sniffing out each corner but only ever faintly—not setting down roots in any land or staying long enough to see the substratum of things; the outer limits would suffice (p. 76).
2. Consider the following questions:
   • How do these quotations help you understand the message or theme of this memoir?
   • What observations does the memoir make about human nature?
   • Is the memoir making a recommendation to the reader about how to live one’s life?
3. Write a three paragraph analysis of The Motorcycle Diaries using the following steps:
   • Write a statement that supports your analysis of theme in this memoir.
   • Find quotations from the book excerpts as evidence to support your thesis statement, including setting, language, point of view, and metaphor.
   • Find scenes and specific cinematic elements from the film to support your statement.
4. Post your three paragraphs to the journal

For this assignment you will write a Rhetorical Analysis Essay. You need to read Blink by Malcolm Gladwell pages 189 through 254. You need to watch videos. Please only bid on this if you have access to the book and are familiar with rhetorical analysis .

Instructions:

1. Read Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking by Malcolm Gladwell.
2. Analyze Gladwell’s rhetorical strategies, noting how these strategies make his work successful and convincing or not–Your paper must have a thesis that makes an overall claim that reflects the conclusions of your analysis.
3. Include a minimum of two (2) credible sources from the college library, in addition to the article presented and videos presented in the class, to support your ideas, making sure to cite them both in your paper and on a works cited page in MLA format.
4. Write a well developed introduction with a strong thesis statement at the end of the introduction. I also wish to see well developed body paragraphs that clearly support and connect to the thesis through the topic sentence. Lastly, I need to see a well developed conclusion that sums up your essay.

Minimum requirements:

• Three full pages minimum of essay plus a required works cited page in MLA format.
• Two credible sources in addition to the article presented, properly cited in MLA format–remember to review the previous lesson on what qualifies as a credible, scholarly source.

The questions below will help you explore various rhetorical strategies and focus on elements that strengthen or weaken the argument. However, rhetorical analysis purpose is not to describe techniques and strategies; instead, it is to show how the key devices in an argument actually make it succeed or fail. Show readers where and why an argument makes sense and where it falls apart by quoting from the text, explaining your reasoning, and providing evidence from other texts. The hardest part of rhetorical analysis is to keep your distance as it doesn’t matter whether you agree or disagree with an argument and focus only on how well/poorly the argument works. Thus, your claim should address the rhetorical effectiveness of the argument itself, NOT the opinion or position it takes and should indicate important relationships between various rhetorical components, NOT just list them. Hence, you’re not simply announcing the evidence, but analyze its significance and appropriateness.

Questions for Rhetorical Analysis

• Who is the writer/organization? Any bias?
• What is the major claim?
• Who is the audience?
• What is the purpose – To explain? To inform? To anger? Persuade? Amuse? Motivate? Explore? Sadden? Ridicule? Anger? Is there more than one purpose? Does the purpose shift at all throughout the text?
• What is the context – the larger social or cultural context and the ongoing conversation on the topic? Reading the articles one should pay attention to the larger sense of culture, politics, and history in which the article appears; potential bias or point of view; place of publication; how the ongoing conversation affects what you think; how your own cultural, political, ethnic, or personal background affects what you believe.
• What appeals does the argument use – emotional, logical, ethical?
• What evidence does the writer use – facts, experts’ testimony, personal experience?
• What claims are advanced in the argument – fact, definition, cause-and-effect, value, policy?
• How is the argument presented? What is its organization and structure? What is the logic of its order? How does this structure create and/or constrain the text’s meaning? How does it shape the text and its argument?
• How does the language, style or tone of the argument work to persuade an audience? The basics of style are word choice, figurative language (similes, metaphors), sentence structure, and paragraphing. How does the writer use qualifiers? (To qualify their thoughts writers use such qualifiers, for example, as sometimes, often, presumably, unless, almost) Does the writer use irony, humor, or sarcasm to be persuasive? Does the writer use a very formal tone, a highly technical vocabulary, or an impersonal voice to signal that an argument is for experts only?
• Does the writer present his/her claim fairly addressing the opposition and providing counter arguments for their major claims?

What values and beliefs does the text promote and how they shape the argument and limit or expand the rhetorical strategies available to the writer?

Please label the cover sheet

Name: Master Muhammad

Teacher: Professor Wilson

Course: English 101

Date: 5-4-18

The purpose of this assignment is to teach you to identify four literary elements of the literary essay. You will learn to recognize and write about four elements of a literary essay: Voice, Style, Structure, and Ideas.

Directions

1. Read the definitions of the four non-fiction elements listed here:

   Voice, Style, Structure, Ideas.

   • Voice: When we read a literary essay, we usually hear the narrator’s voice; we hear a person speaking to us and we begin to notice if he or she sounds friendly or hostile, stuffy or casual, self-assured or tentative. The voice may be intimate or remote. It may be sincere or ironic. The possibilities are as endless as the number of essayists. A writer’s persona is the personality he/she assumes through his/her voice to serve the purpose of the essay.
   • Style: Writers have unique styles, the same way stylish people we know have a personal style. Writers make specific choices in words, syntax, sentence length, metaphors, repetition and many other ways to manipulate language and create a unique sound in their writing.
   • Structure: Literary essayists are not inclined to follow any formulaic structure, as is taught to a first-year college student (i.e., first a topic sentence and then three examples). Instead, they invent structures that fit their own way of seeing the world. Walker’s structure includes sprinkles of personal experience within this persuasive essay to call for changes in the attitude of her reader.
     • Please review this linked PowerPoint presentation on structure:
       • Structure in Literary Essays.ppt
   • Ideas: Literary essays often express ideas more directly than fictional stories. They attempt to persuade the reader to look at the world through a new perspective. Readers of essays are in one sense miners, unearthing hidden meanings. In another sense, they are like co-producers in creating meaning.
2. Find quotations from Walker’s essay that represent each of the four elements above. Write a paragraph explaining why you chose each quote.
   • Voice: How does your chosen quotation represent Walker’s persona in this essay?
   • Style: How does your chosen quotation represent Walker’s unique style?
   • Structure: How does your chosen quotation represent Walker’s persuasive structure?
   • Ideas: How does your chosen quotation uncover the meaning of the essay?
3. Post your quotations and explanations