Group Sponsorship Project (Written 10.0% / Presentation 5.0%)

My sport organization is Cincinnati Bengals, I need about 1500 or more words for this paper.

Premise:

• You are a sport organization. You have to come up with an organization to approach/target to be a sponsor. You will create a sponsorship plan to pitch to the targeted organization. This will include pricing, components of sponsorship, evaluation, etc. You will have a short time to sell us on that idea in your video presentation. You will then turn in a written piece with your presentation.

Requirements:

• Full written proposal (see below)
• 7-minute presentation
• Sell the class, the target sponsor, on why we should purchase sponsorship.

Written Proposal (100 points)

Although sponsorship proposals vary from organization to organization and differ according to the company being approached, here are some general elements most sponsorship proposals include:

• Introductory Letter (10 points) – The proposal should start with a cover letter that briefly introduces your organization and what you have to offer. A good cover letter encourages the sponsor to take the time to read and listen to the proposal.

• Sponsorship Overview (10 points) – You should have a section that highlights the key elements of the partnership emphasizing the benefits that the sponsor will realize from aligning with the organization or event. The proposal should be clearly presented in relation to how the sponsorship will produce benefits for the sponsor. Some examples of things you may want to include in the executive summary are:

• What are you offering the sponsor?
• How is the event compatible with the sponsor’s image?
• How will this sponsorship help the company access its key markets?
• How will this sponsorship help the organization meet its goals and objectives?
• What other benefits will this partnership produce?
• Why should they spend with you in this economic time?

• Profile of the Sport Organization and/or Description of the Event (20 points) – Provide information that will help the sponsor get a better understanding of your organization and your capabilities. This information should be geared toward giving reasons why they should be comfortable partnering with your organization. Some items may include:
  • Brief history of the organization.
  • Mission, goals, and objectives of the organization.
  • Venue location, dates, times, staffing, etc.
  • Inventory of events, assets and benefits.
  • Past attendance figures and audience profile.
  • Organization’s capabilities and experience in producing an event.

• Sponsorship Opportunities (15 points) – The individual components of the sponsorship should be presented to the sponsor in detail. Provide information on exactly what the sponsor could derive from each sponsorship component. Provide an explanation of specific benefits and give the potential sponsor reason why they would be interested in these benefits (i.e. increased sales, product trial and exposure, media coverage and exposure, customer hospitality and promotion opportunities, etc.).

• Sponsorship Investment (20 points) – List the range of prices for the sponsorship package. If you would like to present individual components of the package and price, that is acceptable.

• Impact Measurement (15 points) – Detail how the sponsor’s benefits will be measured and evaluated.

• Addendum – Include or attach any collateral materials that may help the sponsor make a decision. You could include information such as audience demographics, past event programs, brochures, a list of co-sponsors, etc.

• Visual Appeal of Document (10 points)

• Professionalism of Document (-1.5 for each proofing error; -1.0 for grammar errors)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Presentation Format (I need about 800 words speech draft)

• Must be in a video format.
• Tell us about your sponsorship idea.
• Time is 7-minutes (1-minute buffer each way) Very strict on this time, make sure to practice!
• Professional Dress Required
• Format is open. Graded on:
  • Introduction & Closing ___/ 20
  • Visual/Audio/Handout ___/ 20
  • Energy/Enthusiasm ___/ 15
  • Sponsorship Overview ___/ 10
  • Investment ___/ 10
  • Impact Measurement ___/ 10
  • Presentation of material / Preparedness / Q&A ___/ 15

Create and develop a “Quality Assurance Checklist” model that can be used
to determine whether or not an assessment meets standards of validity and
reliability. Your checklist should include construct validity, instructional
validity, and consequence validity indicators. In your checklist ask yourself
specific questions that will guide you in developing learning assessments that
meet the standard of validity. Your checklist should also include reliability
indicators. Develop questions that will guide you in developing learning
assessments that meet the standard of reliability.
2. Provide a detailed description of a test that you would like to use at the
conclusion of a unit of study. Indicate how you would use the Quality
Assurance Checklist to ensure that your test had met the standards of validity
and reliability. Integrate key points from Wilson’s formative assessment article
and the Understanding by Design process.
3. Design a test that meets a variety of learning outcomes and that applies the
standards of validity and reliability.

Module 5 Assignment: Privacy, Surveillance & Dataveillance

M5R Final Due Date: Fri, June 29th at 11:45PM.

Worth: 5%

Minimum Word Count: 700 words Maximum Word Count: 800 words

This module response is based on the reading – Hackman, R. (2015). “Is the online surveillance of black teenagers the new stop-and-frisk?” The Guardian: April 23, 2015. (I have also attached it to this assignment in Sakai).

Read the Hackman (2015) article regarding the increasing use of online/social media surveillance by police services in North America. Be mindful of the problematic social issues surrounding this that are discussed, such as the reliability of algorithms for data collection, ethical use of personal information/data (even if it is public), self-surveillance, barriers to active engagement in participatory culture – and more.

You are asked to A) critically and analytically examine three social issues from Hackman’s (2015) article that are pertinent to this module’s theme of Privacy, Surveillance & Dataveillance, and that (B) can be connected to the discussion in one of the assigned readings for module five (three issues = three separate readings). Remember to organize your response with an introduction, body (discussion of three issues/readings), and conclusion.

Important Notes:

• The ‘tone’ is academic and more ‘formal’; avoid first person, watch your vocabulary – do not be conversational, do not use contractions.
• Your M5R response must include at least three of the module five readings, plus Hackman (2015) must be cited and referenced properly (that’s four references in total minimum).
• You are required to stay within the minimum and maximum word count, or you will be penalized .5 (half a mark).
• Do not provide descriptive opinions and speculations, make succinct arguments that are supported by research and literature.
• Double space your submission. Please pay attention to your writing style: grammar and punctuation matter. Have someone proofread your work. Your responses must have an introduction, body/discussion, and conclusion. Response submissions should not be one paragraph. No need for title pages, or running header this assignment.
• Properly cite and reference any readings that you use in APA format. Submissions that do not cite and reference material properly will not be accepted and will result in a zero. This means, if nothing is cited or referenced in your submission – it will not be accepted. It is the student’s responsibility to ensure they are meeting university standards for academic writing, regardless of what your home department is. Please review page twelve of the course syllabus.
• Do not use any direct quotes in your module submissions – Instead, rephrase and cite properly. You will be penalized .5 (half a mark) if you use direct quotes. Paraphrase and cite properly (this is a learned skill).
• Please name your M5R file properly with course number, last name, and assignment name. For example: 2F00YourLastNameM5R.doc

How to submit this assignment:

• Go to Assignments on Sakai.
• Click M5R and and click ‘Add Attachments’. The file must be a .doc file, or a .pdf file. (Note: If you are using a Mac, you can convert a Pages document into a word .doc file by going to the menu bar and choosing: ‘File’ – ‘Export’– ‘Word’).
• Files that cannot open and/or incorrect files will receive a grade of 0.
• We will not be tracking down assignments: you must submit properly, on-time.
• Check and double check to ensure that the file is attached and is the correct file. After submitting, definitely review your submission so you can see/confirm the file.
• It is your responsibility to ensure that you have uploaded your file into Sakai. You have a maximum of five re-submission attempts BEFORE the deadline passes.
• Late assignments are not accepted and will receive a grade of 0.
• Assignments sent via e-mail will receive a grade of 0.
• Do not wait until the last ten minutes to submit your module response.
• Technological issues (ie my laptop froze at 11:44pm) are not grounds for extensions. You MUST have the appropriate (and reliable) technology to take this course, and you must plan your time effectively.
• An assignment is ‘done’ or ‘finished’ when it is successfully submitted to Sakai before the due date, not when you last edited the assignment on your pc, laptop, or device.

M5R Grading Rubric

The MR5 Grading Rubric is included here in order to help you formulate your submission.

Response

Criteria:

-chooses three social issues from Hackman (2015) that are pertinent to the module five

-critically examines three social issues from Hackman’s (2015) article

-each of the three issues discussed are connected to a different assigned reading for module five (three issues= three readings)

-response is critical and analytical rather than descriptive and opinionated

Writing Style & Referencing

Criteria:

-presents discussion in an academic/formal manner; vocabulary is appropriate to analysis.

-cites sources properly according to APA format

-provides a properly APA formatted reference list of cited sources; Hackman (2015) is cited and referenced properly.

-flows well organizationally with clear writing style & proper tone; introduction, body with supporting evidence, and conclusion.

-presents discussion free of typos, and free of grammar, punctuation, spelling, and paragraph structure errors; is double spaced.

Framework of Grading

Incomplete 50s D

Submission is missing key components of the assignment guidelines.

Inaccuracies 60s C

Submission does not follow assignment guidelines or requirements.

Needs Work 70s B

Submission mostly follows requirements, but has areas that need improvement (ie depth of analysis).

Meets Criteria 80s A

Submission follows guidelines and meets all assignment requirements in a coherent way.

Exceeds Expectations 90 A+

Submission reflects a level of analysis that goes beyond what is expected at a second year course level.

Resources: Tutorial help on Excel® and Word functions can be found on the Microsoft® Office website. There are also additional tutorials via the web offering support for Office products.

Create a minimum 10-slide PowerPoint® presentation, including detailed speaker notes or voiceover, in which you analyze your choice of one the following markets or industries:

• The housing market
• Financial markets
• Commodity and stock markets
• An industry of your choice, such as the automobile industry, the airline industry, retail trade, or any other major industry that suffered heavy losses during the Great Recession

Your analysis will extend from the beginning of the Great Recession, which was December 2007, to the present and should include the following:

• An Excel® workbook with the following datasets:
  • One dataset related to the U.S. housing industry such as housing starts, the FHFA housing price index, or another dataset of your choice related to the housing market.
  • One dataset related to personal or household income or to personal or household saving.
  • One dataset related to the labor market such as the unemployment rate, initial claims for unemployment insurance, or another dataset of your choice related to the U.S. labor force.
  • One dataset related to production and business activity within the market or industry you choose to analyze.
• Find your datasets by using different internet data sources, including, but not limited to, the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis’s FRED site, U.S. Dept. of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), U.S. Dept. of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Census Bureau, and The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Using data results analyze the economic and sociological forces that drove the market equilibrium to unsustainable heights, commonly referred to as “bubbles,” and the shocks that brought the markets back down.
• Discuss specific changes in supply and demand within the markets and/or industries you chose to analyze.
• Examine prior government policies and legislation that might have exacerbated the impact of the shocks. Also, discuss government actions/regulations that might be undertaken, and/or have been undertaken, to moderate the effects of extreme economic fluctuations.
• Evaluate the actions of the federal government (fiscal policy) and the Federal Reserve (monetary policy) to restore the economy and foster economic growth. Base your evaluation on information available at Internet sources such as, but not limited to, the Fed’s The Economy Crisis and Response website as well as other appropriate sources found on the Internet and in the University Library. Be sure you address the effectiveness of those counter-cyclical policies.

Cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources and economic data not including the course text. Submit the data results in a separate Microsoft® Excel® file.

Format the assignment consistent with APA guidelines.