Week 5 Professional Long Term Goals and Short Term Goals Paper Health Medical Assignment Help

I have finished a draft of my paper, and my professor gave me some feedback to revise, I just need revise my original paper and add some new parts, do not write a new one, thank you.

Feedback from my Professor,

Your reflections are great and you are showing good insight and analysis. I love love your subheadings. They make the paper readable and easy.

The definition of ethnorelativism should have been from an academic source, even our own assigned book. After that you put your own definition. But stating the ‘is used to define’ – is inaccurate. Used to define by whom? you need a citation. Also, you in the Jandt reference, the book title needs to be italicized. Not sure why you italicized a part of it but not all of it.

Reflection: Ethnorelativism and Cultural Competency: While you have defined it according to your understanding of it, ethnorelativism should have been defined with a credible source.
Reflection: Sensitivity Issues: You are showing great cultural sensitivity. Good job.
Sources/Citations: Minor error in citations.
Articulation of Response: Well-written paper with good organization and flow. Good job.

Perspectives: A Tale of Two Historians

In history, bias is defined as the incorporation of personal assumptions, beliefs, and values into historical writing. Sometimes this bias is conscious, and other times it is unconscious. Reading a bit more about a historian can help you understand their personal assumptions, beliefs, and values. In turn, this can help you understand what biases they might potentially introduce in their writing.

Two major historians, Howard Zinn and Larry Schweikart, have written popular books on American history containing very different historical interpretations of the same events. Explore this interactive resource on Zinn and Schweikart to learn about their different personal assumptions, beliefs, and values that might influence how each historian interprets historical events and might introduce bias into their writing.

http://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/course_repository…

A text only version is available: HIS 100 Module One A Tale of Two Historians Text Only Transcript

Perspectives: A Tale of Two Historical Biases

Now that you have learned a bit about Zinn’s and Schweikart’s personal assumptions, beliefs, and values, take a look at how they have written about the same historical events: Christopher Columbus’s arrival in the Americas in 1492. As you read through each excerpt, be sure to consider what biases may be present in their work.

Howard Zinn

Zinn, H. (2010). A people’s history of the United States. New York, NY: Harper Perennial. “To emphasize the heroism of Columbus and his successors as navigators and discoverers, and to de-emphasize their genocide, is not a technical necessity but an ideological choice. It serves—unwittingly—to justify what was done.

My point is not that we must, in telling history, accuse, judge, condemn Columbus in absentia. It is too late for that; it would be a useless scholarly exercise in morality. But the easy acceptance of atrocities as a deplorable but necessary price to pay for progress (Hiroshima and Vietnam, to save Western civilization; Kronstadt and Hungary, to save socialism; nuclear proliferation, to save us all)—that is still with us. One reason these atrocities are still with us is that we have learned to bury them in a mass of other facts, as radioactive wastes are buried in containers in the earth. We have learned to give them exactly the same proportion of attention that teachers and writers often give them in the most respectable of classrooms and textbooks. This learned sense of moral proportion, coming from the apparent objectivity of the scholar, is accepted more easily than when it comes from politicians at press conferences. It is therefore more deadly.” (p. 9)

Larry Schweikart

Schweikart, L., & Allen, M. (2004). A patriot’s history of the United States: From Columbus’s Great Discovery to the war on terror. New York, NY: Sentinel. “The five‐hundred‐year anniversary of Columbus’s discovery was marked by unusual and strident controversy. Rising up to challenge the intrepid voyager’s courage and vision—as well as the establishment of European civilization in the New World—was a crescendo of damnation, which posited that the Genoese navigator was a mass murderer akin to Adolf Hitler.

Even the establishment of European outposts was, according to the revisionist critique, a regrettable development. Although this division of interpretations no doubt confused and dampened many a Columbian festival in 1992, it also elicited a most intriguing historical debate: did the esteemed Admiral of the Ocean Sea kill almost all the Indians? A number of recent scholarly studies have dispelled or at least substantially modified many of the numbers generated by the anti‐Columbus groups, although other new research has actually increased them.” (pp. 7–8)

Instructions

After reviewing Zinn’s and Schweikart’s personal assumptions, beliefs, and values as well as excerpts from their historical writing, respond to the following questions:

• What do you believe to be the major distinctions in their personal assumptions, beliefs, and values?
• What do you believe to be the major distinctions in their interpretations of history?
• Do you notice any biases? If so, what are they?

Respond to all three questions. Each response should be two to three sentences in length. APA format. At least 2 references.

Competencies

• Evaluate the reasons business combinations occur and the accounting implications of such transactions.
• Critique the development of International Accounting Standards and the implications for US corporations.
• Measure the accounting for foreign currency and its translation.
• Assess the proper accounting for transactions with respect to deferred taxes and leases using the accounting codification and other accounting research tools.
• Justify the proper accounting for transactions with respect to accounting changes and error corrections using the accounting codification and other accounting research tools
• Evaluate the proper accounting for transactions with respect to interim and segment reporting using the accounting codification and other accounting research tools.

Scenario

Swift Cycles is a publicly held, mid-sized manufacturer, with $40 million dollars in annual revenue. Swift has been producing high-end custom cycles currently in the US for the past ten years. Swift has decided to start operations in various locations in Europe in the next five years. In a recent board meeting, the CEO and CFO faced difficult questioning from outside members of the board regarding the impact that adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards might have on the company. Both officers lack a depth of knowledge on the subject and their preparedness for the changes that may be presented.

The CFO has asked you as the Controller to do some preliminary research about the possible transition from US GAAP principles to IFRS standards. The company is publicly held; therefore, it must follow all reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Prepare an analysis and presentation of the impact that adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards would have on the company’s financial statements and its investors. Also, prepare an analysis and operational plan of how this adoption may be accomplished by the company.

Instructions

Analysis of Adopting IFRS:

Create an executive summary that analyzes the impact that adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards would have on Swift’s financial statements and its investors. For your analysis, consider that IFRS will be adopted in their current form. Consider the effects on each of the account groupings (such as foreign currency transactions, deferred taxes, and leases in different countries) for each of the financial statements (balance sheet, income statement, change in equity statement, and statement of cash flows). Explain the implications of consolidating reporting to the parent company versus segment reporting over major areas of the company.

Operational Plan:

Within the executive summary, write a proposal that provides an operational plan of how this adoption may be accomplished in the company. Consider the following in your Operational Plan:

• Resources.
• What policies and procedures should be modified in order meet IFRS requirements?
• How the project should be managed.
• What organizational structures, policies, or procedures should be in place to ensure that the implementation is ethical and compliant with all IFRS requirements?

Presentation to the Executive Board:

For the executive leadership team, create a PowerPoint presentation, 5-10 slides, including slide notes to summarize the essential information regarding the impact of the adoption of IFRS on financial statements and investors of the company, which includes the information from the operational plan. At the end of your executive summary, give your strongest recommendation on the convergence to IFRS.

Use the FASB Codification and IFRS to address all technical accounting issues presented in the questions, being certain to reference the applicable sections of the Codification and IFRS in your report.

Any other sources used to support your responses should similarly be properly documented. You should have other credible sources in addition to the Codification and IFRS.

Week 10 Assignment: Final Portfolio Submission

Click here to submit your final Professional Portfolio.

You may submit the final portfolio in one of three ways:

1. LinkedIn
2. PowerPoint presentation
3. MS Word document

Important: Incorporate all feedback from your instructor on each portfolio item. Additionally, consider and revise per peer review suggestions in last week’s discussion.

• For PowerPoint presentations or Word documents, upload as an attachment here in the assignment area.
• For LinkedIn submissions, provide the link (review the instructions below or review the “Finding and Linking your LinkedIn URL” PDF document (provided in the link below).
  • Submit the URL link to your LinkedIn profile here to the assignment area for evaluation.
  • To get the URL, you must:

1. Click the arrow under your picture that says “Me” in the top-right corner of LinkedIn.
2. Click the blue link that says view profile.
3. Click edit your public profile on the right side of the screen.
4. This will show your assigned LinkedIn URL. You may edit it if you like.
5. It is recommended that you also include this URL on your resume/CV once your profile is complete.

I want for this a Power point presentation

I will submit to you all the papers and you put it all together in a power point