WSU Crumhorn Research Paper Humanities Assignment Help. WSU Crumhorn Research Paper Humanities Assignment Help.
(/0x4*br />
Option 1. Select one early musical instrument to research from the list below:
Clavichord – Cornetto (or cornett) – Crumhorn – Harpsichord – Hurdy Gurdy – Lute – Pipe and Tabor – Portative Organ – Psaltery – Rebec – Sackbut – Serpent – Shawm – Vielle – Viol
(Not sure where to start? Choose a strange-sounding name that is unfamiliar to you!)
Spend some time researching your chosen instrument on the internet. Please note that you are primarily researching the version of the instrument that was used in the medieval/Renaissance periods, not any modern equivalent. Use the following as a basis for your research:
- What type of instrument is this? Woodwind, brass, strings, keyboard, percussion? Haut (high) or bas (low)?
- How is this instrument played and how does it produce sound?
- What does the instrument sound like? See if you can find an audio recording or YouTube video featuring the instrument. (Tip: a recordings anthology called “Dictionary of Medieval and Renaissance Instruments,” available on YouTube, includes recordings of many of these instruments.)
- What kind of music did this instrument play? Dance music? Sacred music? Song accompaniments?
- Was this instrument played on its own or with other instruments? What kinds of other instruments might you hear with it?
- During what centuries was this instrument used?
- Was the instrument associated with any specific country, region, or group of musicians?
- What modern instrument(s) is this early instrument similar to? What are the similarities and differences?
- Note down anything else about your chosen instrument that seems interesting and unusual!
Option 2. Listen to the madrigal “As Vesta was from latmos hill descending”
Describe where text painting is happening and how it is happening in at least 5 instances. Indicate when it is happening in the recording through the timings. Explain how texture, mode (major or minor) musical device, meter, and number of voices contribute to the text painting.
Based on your research and the guiding questions above, write a minimum of 400 words about your selected instrument. Do not copy word-for-word from websites (this would be a plagiarism violation) or answer the above questions in order! Organize the information that you have found, select the most important and interesting points for inclusion in your homework, and present the information in your own words.
This homework is worth 5% of your final grade. You can view the grading rubric below.
Late assignments will be penalized by 10% per day late.
Word count: minimum 400 words. Include a word count at the bottom of your work.
Submission requirements:
- Upload your work as a Microsoft Word (doc or docx) file. No other file types will be accepted. Include your full name and Introduction to Music Online: Homework No.3 at the top of the document.
- Your document should have double line spacing on letter-size paper and use Times New Roman, 12pt, or a similar font.
- All submitted work must be your own. Any quoted material must be cited in a conventional manner. Please note that your work will be automatically checked for plagiarism by the Turnitin service, and that any plagiarism infractions will be treated severely.
Questions? Email with any questions or problems from the “Inbox” button on the left of the screen.
Grading rubric:
WSU Crumhorn Research Paper Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]
Criminal Db Law Assignment Help
Considering the case you chose in Module 2, write a paper that considers a criminological theory on why the perpetrator(s) committed the crime(s) they did. This could be a theory we have discussed in class, or one that you propose yourself. Do NOT just state the theory, but explain HOW this theory makes sense in this context. If you choose, explain why this theory fits the best by discussing other possible theories and explaining why the one you posit is the best fit. This paper must have 3 academic sources.
All papers must be 3-5 pages completed in Microsoft Word, using a 12 point font in Times New Roman, and be double spaced. All papers will be presented in APA format in accordance with “Publications Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th Edition.” Papers will be written in a style that reflects writing competency that is acceptable for professionals in the criminal justice field and should all have at least 3 academic sources. Each paper must have a cover page, body of information, and a reference page.
[supanova_question]
INBS 561 Emerging Trends in Global Markets Business Finance Assignment Help
Written Case Report: Koc Holding: Arcelik White Goods
Question Description
Please submit a Case Analysis and Written Report 4 pages single spaced, plus appendix table to support quantitative information (example attached in sample document).
Attached:
**The Case Method ( Full instructions attached)
**Reading material
**Case Report Sample
Writing the Report: Please use the following system of organization for your written report.
I.Problem/Issue Statement
II.Alternatives
III.Analysis (Use your alternatives as subheadings)
IV.Recommendation
V.Plan of Action
VI.Contingency Plans
You must sift through the data presented to uncover all the relationships that apply to the alternatives being considered. Hence the quantitative information must be examined employing a variety of ratios, graphs, tables, or other forms of analysis.
[supanova_question]
ENGL001 Research Paper Humanities Assignment Help
Research Paper Assignment:
In this unit, you will compose a research proposal, provide a topic sentence outline.
Requirements:
–Essay should be roughly 8-10 pages, including Works Cited page (going over is fine, as long as it’s not repetitive: 12 pages max)
–Papers should be typed, double spaced, Times New Roman, 1-inch margins.
Sources:
–3 scholarly articles
–3 non-scholarly articles/podcasts/newspaper articles/interviews/videos
**At least two articles must present your counterargument or your opposing point of view
Topics: Women in the Middle East? Can we bring Western ideals of feminism to the Middle East? Will it work? Is it offensive to their culture to do so?
[supanova_question]
Risk Management – Providing support for Processes, Organizational missions, formal risk management. Computer Science Assignment Help
Overview
As discussed in this course, risk management is an important process for all organizations. This is particularly true in information systems, which provides critical support for organizational missions. The heart of risk management is a formal risk management plan. The project activities described in this document allow you to fulfill the role of an employee participating in the risk management process in a specific business situation.
Submission Requirements
All project submissions should follow this format:
- Format: Microsoft Word
- Cover page with all group members names
- Minimum 8 pages (not including reference page(s), or title page)
- Table of contents page
- Font: Arial, 10-point, double-space
- APA Citation Style
Scenario
You are an information technology (IT) intern working for Health Network, Inc. (Health Network), a fictitious health services organization headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Health Network has over 600 employees throughout the organization and generates $500 million USD in annual revenue. The company has two additional locations in Portland, Oregon and Arlington, Virginia, which support a mix of corporate operations. Each corporate facility is located near a co-location data center, where production systems are located and managed by third-party data center hosting vendors.
Company Products
Health Network has three main products: HNetExchange, HNetPay, and HNetConnect.
HNetExchange is the primary source of revenue for the company. The service handles secure electronic medical messages that originate from its customers, such as large hospitals, which are then routed to receiving customers such as clinics.
HNetPay is a Web portal used by many of the company’s HNetExchange customers to support the management of secure payments and billing. The HNetPay Web portal, hosted at Health Network production sites, accepts various forms of payments and interacts with credit-card processing organizations much like a Web commerce shopping cart.
HNetConnect is an online directory that lists doctors, clinics, and other medical facilities to allow Health Network customers to find the right type of care at the right locations. It contains doctors’ personal information, work addresses, medical certifications, and types of services that the doctors and clinics offer. Doctors are given credentials and are able to update the information in their profile. Health Network customers, which are the hospitals and clinics, connect to all three of the company’s products using HTTPS connections. Doctors and potential patients are able to make payments and update their profiles using Internet-accessible HTTPS Web sites.
Information Technology Infrastructure Overview
Health Network operates in three production data centers that provide high availability across the company’s products. The data centers host about 1,000 production servers, and Health Network maintains 650 corporate laptops and company-issued mobile devices for its employees.
Additional Information
- Server breakdown
- 100 Windows Server 2008
- 900 Windows Server 2016
- Laptop breakdown
- 500 Windows 10
- 50 Windows XP
- 100 Linux
Deliverables
Graded Deliverable 1
As a group, develop the following:
- As a group, develop the following:
1. A risk management plan to include the following sections:
1. Use the template provided
2. Must include all sections identified in the template
3. Must include at least 20 identified risks
4. Must include a list of at least 40 “mitigating” controls in place and identify what asset they apply to
5. Must write mitigation plans for the top 10 risks
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
Education assignments Writing Assignment Help
S part 2
Do a powerpoint similar to the attachment but not the same
S part 3
A lesson plan is the teacher’s guide for running a lesson, and it includes the goal (what the students are supposed to learn), how the goal will be reached (the method, procedure) and a way of measuring how well the goal was reached. I have provided lesson plan videos to view, also review teaching tolerance website for additional information to assist with planning your lesson plan outline. Look at the videos I provided and do research on early childhood lesson plans.
This activity requires you to create a teaching lesson plan for preschool children in your classroom. Teachers are expected to teach and how the teacher is expected to teach young children in a diverse society. A lesson plan is a teacher’s detailed description of the course of instruction for one class. A daily lesson plan is developed by a teacher to guide class instruction.
Details will vary depending on the preference of the teacher, subject being covered, and the need and/or curiosity of students. There may be requirements mandated by the school system regarding the plan, or by a children’s center that services young children.
You are to create a lesson plan that will teach young preschoolers about multiculturalism. The lesson can be an art, science, music and movement, literacy or numbers.
Education assignments Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]
ENGL001 Topic Sentences Humanities Assignment Help
Outcomes for the Topic Sentence Outline:
- Conduct research on a given topic, using available databases that provide both primary and secondary sources
- Evaluate sources based on CAPOW: currency, authority, purpose, objectivity and writing style
- Distinguish between sources that provide support for your argument or counterargument
- Arrange sources to form a hierarchical argument that is not repetitive but is reliant on the previous source and gestures forward to the next idea. This requires transitional thought between arguments.
Topic: Women in the Middle East? Can we bring Western ideals of feminism to the Middle East? Will it work? Is it offensive to their culture to do so?
Please upload your topic sentence outline for your research paper. One sentence per paragraph. Follow the following structure:
1. Thesis statement
2. Background paragraph
3. Background continued using Engel as your source
4. Counter-Argument #1
5. Counter-Argument #2
6. Main argument #1 that counters one of the above counter arguments
7. Sub argument
8. Sub argument
9. Sub argument
10 Conclusion
[supanova_question]
I need a case study Health Medical Assignment Help
Hello,
I need someone to write case study in APA format.
Description:
Students much review the case study and answer all questions with a scholarly response using APA and include 2 scholarly references. Answer both case studies on the same document and upload 1 document to Moodle.
Case Study 1 & 2 Lyme Disease and Peripheral Vascular Disease
The answers must be in your own words with reference to journal or book where you found the evidence to your answer. Do not copy paste or use a past students work as all files submitted in this course are registered and saved in turn it in program.
Answers must be scholarly and be 3-4 sentences in length with rationale and explanation. No Straight forward / Simple answer will be accepted.
Turn it in Score must be less than 50% or will not be accepted for credit, must be your own work and in your own words. You can resubmit, Final submission will be accepted if less than 50%. Copy paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated. Please see College Handbook with reference to Academic Misconduct Statement.
All answers to case studies must have reference cited in text for each answer and minimum of 2 Scholarly References (Journals, books) (No websites) per case Study
The assignment will be checked for plagiarism. Please make sure you don’t copy and paste from other resources.
See files attached below!
[supanova_question]
data mining projects Programming Assignment Help
Project
Discover something by mining a significant data set
Have some original idea that uses something we learned in class
(classification, clustering, sentiment analysis, etc.)
Or maybe improve an algorithm or define a problem and solve it
Output should be something that can be presented at a poster
session like the STEM symposium
Or it could possibly become a published paper
Project Proposal
What is a project proposal?
A brief (1 page) document that answers the following:
– Statement of the problem
– How you plan on solving it
– What data will you use and how will you get it
– What algorithms will you use
– How will you measure success
– What do you expect to present at the end of the term
Project Poster Contents
Statement of the problem
Why should people care about the problem
Your approach to solving the problem and why you
chose this design
Details of your process
What is original about your research
Conclusions/Lessons Learned/Implications
Again, you probably won’t actually produce a poster, but
instead create a dozen powerpoints and present those
[supanova_question]
Analysis for company management structure (Hierarchy) Business Finance Assignment Help
Organizational Structure and the Future of Hierarchy
A great deal of attention has been given to the decentralization of modern work organizations, but recent thinking suggests that “flattening” organizations does not necessarily foster a more democratic work environment. The logical extension of a flat organization is one that as no hierarchy and no managers. But no such company exists, does it? Actually, there is a very successful company with no managers, no hierarchy, and no assigned jobs. That company is the Valve Corporation–the leader in video games.
This assignment requires you to analyze organizational structures and their influence on employee behavior by comparing the structure at Valve Corp. with that of a traditional bureaucracy. Begin by reading an unfavorable
and a more favorable article about structure and employee behavior at Valve. The first takes a positive view and the second presents a more negative view of the highly decentralized structure at Valve. Next, review the online lecture about organizational structure.
You are now ready to begin this assignment. Answer each of the following questions (33 points each):
1. Explain how Valve’s structure differs from that of a bureaucracy with respect to decision-making authority, access to information, and work autonomy (i.e., how much freedom employees are given in defining their jobs)?
2. What is the basis for gaining and keeping power at Valve versus a bureaucratic organization? Specifically, explain how one gets and keeps power in both of these structures.
3. Which structure offers more protection from managerial abuses of power and arbitrary decision-making? Is Valve’s structure better suited to protecting employee rights or is bureaucracy better able to foster employee rights?
structure rubric (1)
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ1 Knowledge of Organizational Structures
|
| 33.0 pts
Outstanding
Complete and correct analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures written in the student’s own words. Thorough analysis of decision-making, information access and work autonomy that was high quality across all three areas. Extensive and correct application of course material
|
30.0 pts
Very Good
Detailed analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures written in the student’s own words. Analysis, while clear and convincing was not as complete as it might have been. Analysis of decision-making authority, information and work autonomy was correct and well done, but it varied in quality across these three topics. Very good use of course material.
|
28.0 pts
Good
Correct analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures written mostly in the student’s own words. Analysis was not as thorough or as insightful as it might have been. Complete analysis of decision-making, information access and work autonomy that was high quality across all three areas. Application of course material was good, but some concepts were either missing or not fully discussed.
|
25.0 pts
Average
Basic analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures written with a mix of student’s own words and jargon from outside sources. Very basic analysis of decision-making, information access and work autonomy that was inconsistent across these three areas. Sparse application of course material.
|
20.0 pts
Poor
Incorrect analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures based on jargon from outside sources. Little or no analysis of decision-making, information access and work autonomy. Minimal application of course material
|
0.0 pts
No Submission or Answer Unrelated to Question
|
|
33.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ2 Power and Structure
|
| 34.0 pts
Outstanding
Thorough and succinct analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Identification of the correct concepts to conduct this analysis and complete and correct application to question asked. Response written in the student’s own words.
|
30.0 pts
Very Good
Thoughtful analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Identification of most of the correct concepts to conduct this analysis. Discussion was not as detailed as it might have been, but did address the key issues raised in the question. Response written in the student’s own words.
|
28.0 pts
Good
Correct but not complete analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Identification of some of the correct concepts to conduct this analysis. Discussion lacked detail and clarity at times but did address the key issues raised in the question. Response written in the student’s own words.
|
25.0 pts
Average
Basic analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Identification of a few of the correct concepts to conduct this analysis. Discussion lacked detail and clarity and did not fully address the key issues raised in the question. Response included jargon from outside sources that was not explained well.
|
20.0 pts
Poor
Incomplete and incorrect analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Discussion lacked detail and clarity and did address the key issues raised in the question. Response included jargon from outside sources that was not explained well.
|
0.0 pts
No Submission or Answer Unrelated to Question
|
|
34.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ3 Structure and Employee Rights
|
| 33.0 pts
Outstanding
Thorough and thoughtful analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis uses course material to provide depth and insight, and was written entirely in the student’s own words.
|
30.0 pts
Very Good
Thoughtful analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis made some use of course material to provide depth and insight, but it could have been more complete, and was written entirely in the student’s own words.
|
28.0 pts
Good
Well conducted analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis made some course material to provide insight, but discussion lacked depth at times. Answer was written primarily in the student’s own words with some jargon from outside sources.
|
25.0 pts
Average
Very basic analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis made little use course material to provide depth and insight, and was superficial and incomplete. Considerable use of jargon from outside sources.
|
20.0 pts
Poor
Little or no analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis made no use of course material and was superficial and jargon laden.
|
0.0 pts
No Submission or Answer Unrelated to Question
|
|
33.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100.0
|
[supanova_question]
https://anyessayhelp.com/ article about structure and employee behavior at Valve. The first takes a positive view and the second presents a more negative view of the highly decentralized structure at Valve. Next, review the online lecture about organizational structure.
You are now ready to begin this assignment. Answer each of the following questions (33 points each):
1. Explain how Valve’s structure differs from that of a bureaucracy with respect to decision-making authority, access to information, and work autonomy (i.e., how much freedom employees are given in defining their jobs)?
2. What is the basis for gaining and keeping power at Valve versus a bureaucratic organization? Specifically, explain how one gets and keeps power in both of these structures.
3. Which structure offers more protection from managerial abuses of power and arbitrary decision-making? Is Valve’s structure better suited to protecting employee rights or is bureaucracy better able to foster employee rights?
structure rubric (1)
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ1 Knowledge of Organizational Structures
|
| 33.0 pts
Outstanding
Complete and correct analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures written in the student’s own words. Thorough analysis of decision-making, information access and work autonomy that was high quality across all three areas. Extensive and correct application of course material
|
30.0 pts
Very Good
Detailed analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures written in the student’s own words. Analysis, while clear and convincing was not as complete as it might have been. Analysis of decision-making authority, information and work autonomy was correct and well done, but it varied in quality across these three topics. Very good use of course material.
|
28.0 pts
Good
Correct analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures written mostly in the student’s own words. Analysis was not as thorough or as insightful as it might have been. Complete analysis of decision-making, information access and work autonomy that was high quality across all three areas. Application of course material was good, but some concepts were either missing or not fully discussed.
|
25.0 pts
Average
Basic analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures written with a mix of student’s own words and jargon from outside sources. Very basic analysis of decision-making, information access and work autonomy that was inconsistent across these three areas. Sparse application of course material.
|
20.0 pts
Poor
Incorrect analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures based on jargon from outside sources. Little or no analysis of decision-making, information access and work autonomy. Minimal application of course material
|
0.0 pts
No Submission or Answer Unrelated to Question
|
|
33.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ2 Power and Structure
|
| 34.0 pts
Outstanding
Thorough and succinct analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Identification of the correct concepts to conduct this analysis and complete and correct application to question asked. Response written in the student’s own words.
|
30.0 pts
Very Good
Thoughtful analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Identification of most of the correct concepts to conduct this analysis. Discussion was not as detailed as it might have been, but did address the key issues raised in the question. Response written in the student’s own words.
|
28.0 pts
Good
Correct but not complete analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Identification of some of the correct concepts to conduct this analysis. Discussion lacked detail and clarity at times but did address the key issues raised in the question. Response written in the student’s own words.
|
25.0 pts
Average
Basic analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Identification of a few of the correct concepts to conduct this analysis. Discussion lacked detail and clarity and did not fully address the key issues raised in the question. Response included jargon from outside sources that was not explained well.
|
20.0 pts
Poor
Incomplete and incorrect analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Discussion lacked detail and clarity and did address the key issues raised in the question. Response included jargon from outside sources that was not explained well.
|
0.0 pts
No Submission or Answer Unrelated to Question
|
|
34.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ3 Structure and Employee Rights
|
| 33.0 pts
Outstanding
Thorough and thoughtful analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis uses course material to provide depth and insight, and was written entirely in the student’s own words.
|
30.0 pts
Very Good
Thoughtful analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis made some use of course material to provide depth and insight, but it could have been more complete, and was written entirely in the student’s own words.
|
28.0 pts
Good
Well conducted analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis made some course material to provide insight, but discussion lacked depth at times. Answer was written primarily in the student’s own words with some jargon from outside sources.
|
25.0 pts
Average
Very basic analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis made little use course material to provide depth and insight, and was superficial and incomplete. Considerable use of jargon from outside sources.
|
20.0 pts
Poor
Little or no analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis made no use of course material and was superficial and jargon laden.
|
0.0 pts
No Submission or Answer Unrelated to Question
|
|
33.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100.0
|
[supanova_question]
https://anyessayhelp.com/ article about structure and employee behavior at Valve. The first takes a positive view and the second presents a more negative view of the highly decentralized structure at Valve. Next, review the online lecture about organizational structure.
You are now ready to begin this assignment. Answer each of the following questions (33 points each):
1. Explain how Valve’s structure differs from that of a bureaucracy with respect to decision-making authority, access to information, and work autonomy (i.e., how much freedom employees are given in defining their jobs)?
2. What is the basis for gaining and keeping power at Valve versus a bureaucratic organization? Specifically, explain how one gets and keeps power in both of these structures.
3. Which structure offers more protection from managerial abuses of power and arbitrary decision-making? Is Valve’s structure better suited to protecting employee rights or is bureaucracy better able to foster employee rights?
structure rubric (1)
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ1 Knowledge of Organizational Structures
|
| 33.0 pts
Outstanding
Complete and correct analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures written in the student’s own words. Thorough analysis of decision-making, information access and work autonomy that was high quality across all three areas. Extensive and correct application of course material
|
30.0 pts
Very Good
Detailed analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures written in the student’s own words. Analysis, while clear and convincing was not as complete as it might have been. Analysis of decision-making authority, information and work autonomy was correct and well done, but it varied in quality across these three topics. Very good use of course material.
|
28.0 pts
Good
Correct analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures written mostly in the student’s own words. Analysis was not as thorough or as insightful as it might have been. Complete analysis of decision-making, information access and work autonomy that was high quality across all three areas. Application of course material was good, but some concepts were either missing or not fully discussed.
|
25.0 pts
Average
Basic analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures written with a mix of student’s own words and jargon from outside sources. Very basic analysis of decision-making, information access and work autonomy that was inconsistent across these three areas. Sparse application of course material.
|
20.0 pts
Poor
Incorrect analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures based on jargon from outside sources. Little or no analysis of decision-making, information access and work autonomy. Minimal application of course material
|
0.0 pts
No Submission or Answer Unrelated to Question
|
|
33.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ2 Power and Structure
|
| 34.0 pts
Outstanding
Thorough and succinct analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Identification of the correct concepts to conduct this analysis and complete and correct application to question asked. Response written in the student’s own words.
|
30.0 pts
Very Good
Thoughtful analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Identification of most of the correct concepts to conduct this analysis. Discussion was not as detailed as it might have been, but did address the key issues raised in the question. Response written in the student’s own words.
|
28.0 pts
Good
Correct but not complete analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Identification of some of the correct concepts to conduct this analysis. Discussion lacked detail and clarity at times but did address the key issues raised in the question. Response written in the student’s own words.
|
25.0 pts
Average
Basic analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Identification of a few of the correct concepts to conduct this analysis. Discussion lacked detail and clarity and did not fully address the key issues raised in the question. Response included jargon from outside sources that was not explained well.
|
20.0 pts
Poor
Incomplete and incorrect analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Discussion lacked detail and clarity and did address the key issues raised in the question. Response included jargon from outside sources that was not explained well.
|
0.0 pts
No Submission or Answer Unrelated to Question
|
|
34.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ3 Structure and Employee Rights
|
| 33.0 pts
Outstanding
Thorough and thoughtful analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis uses course material to provide depth and insight, and was written entirely in the student’s own words.
|
30.0 pts
Very Good
Thoughtful analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis made some use of course material to provide depth and insight, but it could have been more complete, and was written entirely in the student’s own words.
|
28.0 pts
Good
Well conducted analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis made some course material to provide insight, but discussion lacked depth at times. Answer was written primarily in the student’s own words with some jargon from outside sources.
|
25.0 pts
Average
Very basic analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis made little use course material to provide depth and insight, and was superficial and incomplete. Considerable use of jargon from outside sources.
|
20.0 pts
Poor
Little or no analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis made no use of course material and was superficial and jargon laden.
|
0.0 pts
No Submission or Answer Unrelated to Question
|
|
33.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100.0
|
[supanova_question]
https://anyessayhelp.com/ article about structure and employee behavior at Valve. The first takes a positive view and the second presents a more negative view of the highly decentralized structure at Valve. Next, review the online lecture about organizational structure.
You are now ready to begin this assignment. Answer each of the following questions (33 points each):
1. Explain how Valve’s structure differs from that of a bureaucracy with respect to decision-making authority, access to information, and work autonomy (i.e., how much freedom employees are given in defining their jobs)?
2. What is the basis for gaining and keeping power at Valve versus a bureaucratic organization? Specifically, explain how one gets and keeps power in both of these structures.
3. Which structure offers more protection from managerial abuses of power and arbitrary decision-making? Is Valve’s structure better suited to protecting employee rights or is bureaucracy better able to foster employee rights?
structure rubric (1)
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ1 Knowledge of Organizational Structures
|
| 33.0 pts
Outstanding
Complete and correct analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures written in the student’s own words. Thorough analysis of decision-making, information access and work autonomy that was high quality across all three areas. Extensive and correct application of course material
|
30.0 pts
Very Good
Detailed analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures written in the student’s own words. Analysis, while clear and convincing was not as complete as it might have been. Analysis of decision-making authority, information and work autonomy was correct and well done, but it varied in quality across these three topics. Very good use of course material.
|
28.0 pts
Good
Correct analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures written mostly in the student’s own words. Analysis was not as thorough or as insightful as it might have been. Complete analysis of decision-making, information access and work autonomy that was high quality across all three areas. Application of course material was good, but some concepts were either missing or not fully discussed.
|
25.0 pts
Average
Basic analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures written with a mix of student’s own words and jargon from outside sources. Very basic analysis of decision-making, information access and work autonomy that was inconsistent across these three areas. Sparse application of course material.
|
20.0 pts
Poor
Incorrect analysis of decentralized and bureaucratic organizational structures based on jargon from outside sources. Little or no analysis of decision-making, information access and work autonomy. Minimal application of course material
|
0.0 pts
No Submission or Answer Unrelated to Question
|
|
33.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ2 Power and Structure
|
| 34.0 pts
Outstanding
Thorough and succinct analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Identification of the correct concepts to conduct this analysis and complete and correct application to question asked. Response written in the student’s own words.
|
30.0 pts
Very Good
Thoughtful analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Identification of most of the correct concepts to conduct this analysis. Discussion was not as detailed as it might have been, but did address the key issues raised in the question. Response written in the student’s own words.
|
28.0 pts
Good
Correct but not complete analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Identification of some of the correct concepts to conduct this analysis. Discussion lacked detail and clarity at times but did address the key issues raised in the question. Response written in the student’s own words.
|
25.0 pts
Average
Basic analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Identification of a few of the correct concepts to conduct this analysis. Discussion lacked detail and clarity and did not fully address the key issues raised in the question. Response included jargon from outside sources that was not explained well.
|
20.0 pts
Poor
Incomplete and incorrect analysis of the sources and bases of power in bureaucratic and decentralized structures. Discussion lacked detail and clarity and did address the key issues raised in the question. Response included jargon from outside sources that was not explained well.
|
0.0 pts
No Submission or Answer Unrelated to Question
|
|
34.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ3 Structure and Employee Rights
|
| 33.0 pts
Outstanding
Thorough and thoughtful analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis uses course material to provide depth and insight, and was written entirely in the student’s own words.
|
30.0 pts
Very Good
Thoughtful analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis made some use of course material to provide depth and insight, but it could have been more complete, and was written entirely in the student’s own words.
|
28.0 pts
Good
Well conducted analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis made some course material to provide insight, but discussion lacked depth at times. Answer was written primarily in the student’s own words with some jargon from outside sources.
|
25.0 pts
Average
Very basic analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis made little use course material to provide depth and insight, and was superficial and incomplete. Considerable use of jargon from outside sources.
|
20.0 pts
Poor
Little or no analysis and discussion of the influence of decentralized structures and bureaucratic structures on employee rights. Analysis made no use of course material and was superficial and jargon laden.
|
0.0 pts
No Submission or Answer Unrelated to Question
|
|
33.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100.0
|
